Una valutazione dell’austerità e del debito pubblico italiani (An assessment of Italian austerity programs and public debt)

Autori

  • Daniela Tavasci Queen Mary University of London
  • Luigi Ventimiglia Queen Mary University of London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651_73.292_5

Parole chiave:

fiscal austerity, debt sustainability, stagnation

Abstract

Partendo da un’analisi del debito di Sylos Labini (2003) e Pasinetti (1998), il presente articolo re-esamina criticamente le raccomandazioni di politica economica suggerite dalle teorie che scoraggiano l’intervento dello stato e sostengono l’austerità, incluse l’equivalenza ricardiana, lo spiazzamento, e la struttura analitica IS-LM. Questo lavoro si fonda su un’analisi ampia dei dati per poi concentrarsi su tre modelli econometrici: un primo modello di correzione dell’errore vettoriale (VEC) analizza la relazione tra debito pubblico e PIL nel lungo periodo; un modello di autoregressione vettoriale multidimensionale (VAR) testa la relazione tra produzione, componenti del debito, differenziale dei tassi di interesse (spread) e tasso di cambio nel breve periodo; e un modello VAR aggiuntivo esamina il saldo primario nelle sue componenti, entrate e spese. Infine, ispirandosi a Sylos Labini (2003), il lavoro conclude con una nota a proposito del ruolo dell’investimento e della relazione basso investimento-bassa crescita del reddito in Italia.

Starting from a Sylos Labini’s (2003) and Pasinetti’s (1998) debt analysis, this article critically reviews the policy recommendations suggested by theories which discourage state intervention and support austerity, including the Ricardian equivalence, the crowding out, and the IS-LM analytical framework. This work relies on a wide-ranging data analysis and on three econometric models: a vector error correction (VEC) model analyses the relation between public debt and GDP in the long-run; a vector auto-regression model (VAR) tests the relation between GDP and the component of debt, interest rates spread and exchange rate in the short-run; and an additional VAR model examines primary balance components including fiscal spending and revenues. Finally, inspired by Sylos-Labini (2003), the paper concludes with a reflection on the role of investment and on the viscous circle, low investment-low growth in Italy.

JEL codes:E60, E62, E32


Riferimenti bibliografici

Alesina A.F. e Ardagna S. (2010), “Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes versus Spending”, in Tax Policy and the Economy, Vol. 24 (pp. 35-68), Chicago: University Chicago Press.

Arestis P. e Sawyer M. (2014), “On the Sustainability of Budget Deficit and Public Debts with Reference to the UK”, in Arestis P. e Sawyer M. (a cura di), Fiscal and Debt Policies for the Future (pp. 38-75), London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Banca d’Italia (2019), Historical Time Series of Italian National Accounts 1861–2011, disponibile alla URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/quaderni-storia/2011-0018/index.html?com.dotmarketing.htmlpage.language=1.

Barbosa-Filho N., Rada C., Taylor L. e Zamparelli L. (2008), “Cycles and Trends in U.S. Net Borrowing Flows”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 30 (4), pp. 623-648.

Barro R.J. (2009), “Government Spending Is No Free Lunch”, The Wall Street Journal, 22 gennaio, disponibile alla URL: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123258618204604599.html

Blanchard O.J. e Perotti R. (2002), “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, pp. 1329-1368.

Campbell J.Y., Lo A.W. e MacKinlay A.C. (1996), The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

D’Ippoliti C. e Roncaglia A. (2011), “Una crisi nella crisi”, Moneta e Credito, 64 (255), pp. 189-227.

Domar E.D. (1944), “The ‘Burden of Debt’ and the National Income”, American Economic Review, 34 (4), pp. 798-827.

Godley W. e Cripps, F. (1993), Macroeconomics, New York: Oxford University Press.

Grasa A. (1989), Econometric Model Selection: A New Approach, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

IMF – International Monetary Fund (2019), International Financial Statistics, Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.

Istat (2019), Serie storiche. Table 12.16: main aggregates by institutional sector, Italian National Institute of Statistics, disponibile alla URL: seriestoriche.istat.it/fileadmin/documenti/Table_12.16_ESA95.xls

Massera M., Pirastu A. e Ventro L. (2012), “Il sistema di protezione al lavoro in Italia come la crisi ha cambiato l’intervento di tutela: analisi della Uil dal 2006 al 2011”, disponibile alla URL: http://www.uil.it/documents/STUDIO_COMPLETO_AMMORTIZZATORI.pdf

Mittnik S. e Semmler W. (2012), “Regime Dependence of the Fiscal Multiplier”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 83 (3), pp. 502–22.

OECD Statistics Directorate (2016), “Statistical Insights: Government Assets Matter Too, Not Just Debt”, disponibile alla URL: http://oecdinsights.org/2016/01/28/statistical-insights-government-assets-matter-too-not-just-debt/

Pasinetti L. (1998), “The Myth (or Folly) of the 3% Deficit/GDP Maastricht ‘Parameter’”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, pp. 103-116.

Quadrio Curzio A. (2011), “Economie in crisi: Eurolandia dalla resistenza alla ricostruzione”, Moneta e Credito, 64 (254), pp. 105-114.

Reinhart C.M. e Rogoff K.S. (2010), “Growth in a Time of Debt”, American Economic Review, 100 (2), pp. 573-578.

Roubini N. (2001), “Debt Sustainability: How to Assess Whether a Country Is Insolvent”, mimeo, New York: Stern School of Business, New York University, disponibile alla URL: http://people.stern.nyu.edu/nroubini/papers/debtsustainability.pdf

Schauble W. (2010), “Maligned Germany Is Right to Cut Spending”, Financial Times, 24 giugno.

Sims C., Stock J.H., e Watson M.W. (1990), “Inference in Linear Time Series Models with Some Unit Roots”, Econometrica, 58 (1), pp. 113-144.

Sylos-Labini P. (1948), “Saggio dell’interesse e reddito sociale”, Rendiconti dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Classe di Scienze Morali, III (11-2), pp. 426-453; ripubblicato (2004), Rivista italiana degli economisti, 9 (1), pp. 153-183.

Sylos Labini P. (2003), “Le prospettive dell’economia mondiale”, Moneta e Credito, 56 (223), pp. 267-294; ripubblicato (2009), 62 (245-248), pp. 61-89.

Taylor L., Proano C.R., de Carvalho L. e Barbosa N. (2012), “Fiscal Deficits, Economic Growth and Government Debt in the USA”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36, pp. 189-204.

The Wall Street Journal (2009), “The Bond Vigilantes: The Disciplinarians of U.S. Policy Makers Return”, The Wall Street Journal, 29 maggio, disponibile alla URL: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124347148949660783.html

Tsay R.S. (2005), Analysis of Financial Time Series, Hoboken: Wiley.

Tymoigne E. e Wray L.R. (2013), “Modern Money Theory 101: A Reply to Critics”, Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, n. 778, Annandale-on-Hudson (NY): Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2021-01-16

Fascicolo

Sezione

Numero speciale: attualità del pensiero di Paolo Sylos Labini