Pierangelo Garegnani, come lo intesi alla fine degli anni Ottanta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651/17877Parole chiave:
Garegnani, capital controversies, long run, short run, KeynesAbstract
L’articolo esamina e discute nove dei principali contributi dati da Garegnani alla teoria economica: il suo ruolo nelle controversie di Cambridge sul capitale; le conseguenze delle controversie per la teoria del valore e per la domanda di lavoro; la distinzione metodologica tra breve e lungo periodo; la questione della gravitazione verso i prezzi naturali e il ‘core’ dell’analisi economica; la non validità della teoria dell’equilibrio economico generale (neanche) nel breve periodo; Keynes e la Teoria Generale; la determinazione del tasso di profitto normale a partire dal tasso di interesse monetario invece che attraverso la cosiddetta Equazione di Cambridge; una valutazione empirica delle controversie di Cambridge sul capitale e, per finire, la visione di Garegnani sulla teoria dell’investimento aggregato.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Arena R. (1987), “L’école internationale d’été de Trieste (1981-85): vers une synthèse classico-keynésienne?”, Economies et Sociétés, 21 (3), pp. 205-238.
Cesaratto S. e Mongiovi G. (2015), “Pierangelo Garegnani, the classical surplus approach and demand-led growth: introduction to the symposium”, Review of Political Economy, 27 (2), pp. 103-110.
Ciccone R., Gehrke C. e Mongiovi G. (2011), “Introduction”, in Ciccone R., Gehrke C. e Mongiovi G. (a cura di), Sraffa and Modern Economics, Volume 1 (pp. 1-9), London: Routledge.
Dow S.C. (2001), “Post Keynesian methodology”, in Holt R.P.F. e Pressman S. (a cura di), A New Guide to Post Keynesian Economics (pp. 11-20), London: Routledge.
Duménil G. e Lévy D. (1985), “The classicals and the neoclassicals: a rejoinder to Frank Hahn”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9 (4), pp. 327-346.
Dunn S.P. (2000), “Wither Post Keynesianism?”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 22 (3), pp. 343-364.
Dymski G. e Guizzo D. (2021), “Theoretical practice and foundational level of macroeconomic analysis: reflections on the work of Fernando Cardim de Carvalho”, Review of Political Economics, 33 (3), July, pp. 511-528.
Eatwell J. (1983), “Theories of value, output and employment”, in Eatwell J. e Milgate M. (a cura di), Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (pp. 93-128), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eatwell J. e Milgate M. (a cura di) (1983), Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Englmann F.C. (1987), “Structural change, heterogeneity of capital over time and the non-uniqueness of the uniform rate of profit”, Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 55 (2), pp. 184-196.
Felipe J. e McCombie J.S.L. (2013), Aggregate Production Function and the Measurement of Technical Change: Not Even Wrong, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Galloway L. e Shukla V. (1974), “The neoclassical production function”, American Economic Review, 64 (3), pp. 348-358.
Garegnani P. (1960), Il capitale nelle teorie della distribuzione, Milano: Giuffré.
Garegnani P. (1966), “Switching of techniques”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80 (4), pp. 554-567.
Garegnani P. (1967), “Capital et distribution dans les théories de Walras et Pareto”, Économies et Sociétés, 2 (9), November, pp. 41-95.
Garegnani P. (1970), “Heterogeneous capital, the production function and the theory of distribution”, Review of Economic Studies, 37 (3), pp. 407-436.
Garegnani P. (1976a), “The neoclassical production function: comment”, American Economic Review, 66 (3), pp. 424-427.
Garegnani P. (1976b), “On a change in the notion of equilibrium in recent work on value and distribution: a comment on Samuelson”, in Brown M., Sato K. e Zarembka P. (a cura di), Essays in Modern Capital Theory (pp. 26-45), New York: North Holland.
Garegnani P. (1978), “Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand: I”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2 (4), pp. 335-353.
Garegnani P. (1979a), “Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand: II”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3 (1), pp. 63-82.
Garegnani P. (1979b), “Notes on consumption, investment and effective demand: a reply to Joan Robinson”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3 (1), pp. 181-187.
Garegnani P. (1980), Le capital dans les théories de la répartition, Paris: François Maspero et Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Garegnani P. (1983), “Two routes to effective demand”, in Kregel J. (a cura di), Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations (pp. 69-80), London: Macmillan.
Garegnani P. (1984), “Value and distribution in the classical economists and Marx”, Oxford Economic Papers, 36 (2), pp. 291-325.
Garegnani P. (1990a), “Sraffa: classical versus marginalist analysis”, in Bharadwaj K. e Schefold B. (a cura di) Essays on Piero Sraffa: Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory (pp. 112-158), London: Unwin Hyman.
Garegnani P. (1990b), “Quantity of Capital”, in Eatwell J., Milgate M. e Newman P. (a cura di), The New Palgrave: Capital Theory, (pp. 1-78), London: Macmillan.
Garegnani P. (1992), “Some notes for an analysis of accumulation”, in Halevi J., Laibman D. e Nell E.J. (a cura di), Beyond the Steady State: A Revival of Growth Theory (pp. 47-71), London: Macmillan.
Garegnani P. (2011), “Savings, investment and capital in a system of general intertemporal equilibrium”, in Ciccone R., Gehrke C. e Mongiovi G. (a cura di), Sraffa and Modern Economics, Volume 1 (pp. 13-74), London: Routledge.
Garegnani P. (2013), “On the present state of the capital controversy”, in Levrero E.S., Palumbo A. e Stirati A. (a cura di), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, Volume One, (pp. 15-37), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Garegnani P. (2015), “The problem of effective demand in Italian economic development: on the factors that determine the volume of investment”, Review of Political Economy, 27 (2), pp. 111-133.
Hahn F. (1982), “The neo-Ricardians”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6 (4), pp. 53-374.
Harcourt G.C. (1983), “Keynes’s college bursar view of investment: comment on Kregel”, in Kregel J. (a cura di), Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations (pp. 81-84), London: Macmillan.
Hein E. (2008), Money, Distribution Conflict and Capital Accumulation: Contributions to Monetary Analysis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hodgson G.M. (2019), Is There a Future for Heterodox Economics? Institutions, Ideology and a Scientific Community, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
King J.E. (2008), “The Post Keynesian assault on orthodoxy: insights from the Weintraub archives”, in Leeson R. (a cura di), The Keynesian Tradition (pp. 135-195), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kregel J.A. (1983a), Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations, London, Macmillan.
Kregel J.A. (1983b), “Effective demand: origins and development of the notion”, in Kregel J. (a cura di), Distribution, Effective Demand and International Economic Relations (pp. 50-68), London: Macmillan.
Kurz H.D. (2014), “Keynes, Sraffa and the latter’s secret scepticism”, in Kurz H.D. e Salvadori N. (a cura di), Revisiting Classical Economics (pp. 1-21), London: Routledge.
Lavoie M. (1987), Macroéconomie: Théorie et controverses postkeynésiennes, Paris: Dunod.
Lavoie M. (1995), “Interest rates in post-Keynesian models of growth and distribution”, Metroeconomica, 46 (2), pp. 146-177.
Lavoie M. (1996), “La traverse kaleckienne dans un modèle d’accumulation à deux secteurs avec coût complet: à la recherche d’une synthèse post-classique”, Cahiers d’économie politique, 26, pp. 127-164.
Lavoie M. (2011), “Should Sraffian economics be dropped out of the post-Keynesian school?”, Économies et Sociétés, 44 (7), pp. 1027-1059.
Lavoie M. (2013), “Sraffians, other post-Keynesians, and the controversy over centres of gravitation”, in Levrero E.S., Palumbo A. e Stirati A. (a cura di), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory, Volume Three (pp. 34-54), Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lavoie M. (2014), Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lavoie M. (2020), “Book review: Shiozawa, Yoshinori; Morioka, Masachi; Taniguchi, Kasuhisa: Microfoundations of Evolutionary Economics”, Review of Evolutionary Economics, 1 (2), pp. 265-270.
Lawson T. (1999), “What has realism to do with it?”, Economics and Philosophy, 15, pp. 269-282.
Magnani M. (1983), “Keynesian fundamentalism: a critique”, in Eatwell J. e Milgate M. (a cura di), Keynes’s Economics and the Theory of Value and Distribution (pp. 247-259), New York: Oxford University Press.
Marglin S.A. (2021), Raising Keynes: A Twenty-First Century General Theory, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Mata T. (2005), Dissent in Economics: Making Radical Political Economics and Post Keynesian Economics, 1960-1980, doctoral thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science, http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2691/1/U615640.pdf
Mirlees J.A. e Stern N.H.S. (a cura di) (1973), Models of Economic Growth, London: Macmillan.
Nell E.J. (1988), Prosperity and Public Spending: Transformational Growth and the Role of Government, Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Parrinello S. (1988), “Il ruolo di una scuola estiva di economia”, Economia Politica, 5 (3), pp. 335-341.
Pasinetti L.L. (1969), “Switches of technique and rate of return in capital theory”, Economic Journal, 79 (315), pp. 508-531.
Petri F. (1978), “The difference between long-period and short-period general equilibrium and the capital theory controversy”, Australian Economic Papers, December, pp. 246-260.
Petri F. (2021), “What remains of the Cambridge critique? On Professor Schefold’s theses”, Centro Sraffa working papers, no. 50, Roma: Università Roma Tre, Centro Sraffa.
Pivetti M. (1988), “On the monetary explanation of distribution: a rejoinder to Nell and Wray”, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 4 (2), pp. 275-283.
Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach – Editorial committee (1990), “Announcement”, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 6 (1-2), p. 3.
Robinson J. (1952), The Rate of Interest and Other Essays, London: Macmillan.
Robinson J. (1956), The Accumulation of Capital, London: Macmillan.
Robinson J. (1970), “Capital theory up-to-date”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 4 (2), pp. 254-256.
Robinson J. (1975), “The unimportance of reswitching”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89 (1), pp. 32-39.
Robinson J. (1979), “Garegnani on effective demand”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3 (1), pp. 179-180.
Roncaglia A. (1991), “The Sraffian schools”, Review of Political Economy, 3(2), pp. 187-219.
Roncaglia A. (1995), “On the compatibility between Keynes’s and Sraffa’s viewpoints on output levels”, in Harcourt G.C., Roncaglia A. e Rowley R. (a cura di), Income and Employment in Theory and Practice (pp. 111-125), New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Rymes T.K. (1971), On Concepts of Capital and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Samuelson P.A. (1962), “Parable and realism in capital theory: the surrogate production function”, Review of Economic Studies, 39, pp. 193-206.
Shaikh A. (1974), “Laws of production and laws of algebra: the Humbug production function”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (1), pp. 115-120.
Shaikh A. (1980), “Laws of production and laws of algebra: Humbug II”, in Nell E.J. (a cura di), Growth, Profits and Property: Essays in the Revival of Political Economy (pp. 80-95), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shiozawa Y., Morioka M. e Taniguchi K. (2019), Microfoundations of Evolutionary Economics, Tokyo: Springer.
Sraffa P. (1960), Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Storm S. e Naastepad C.W.M. (2012), Macroeconomics: Beyond the NAIRU, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Vianello F. (1985), “The pace of accumulation”, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 1 (1), pp. 69-87.
Zambelli S. (2018), “The aggregate production function is NOT neoclassical”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42 (2), pp. 383-426.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2022 Marc Lavoie
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.
Ogni materiale pubblicato sul sito e gli articoli pubblicati sulla rivista sono distribuiti con Licenza internazionale Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0. Copia della licenza è disponibile alla URL http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0. Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera con la licenza suindicata.
