Three proposals for revitalising the European Union


  • Mario Tonveronachi University of Siena



European Union, euro area, ECB, monetary policy, fiscal rules, financial regulation


Widespread perception that convergence on the current set of rules is not capable of producing convergence on results, or anyway generally better results, has increased the socio-political fragmentation inside the European Union. The result has been an increasing demand for a partial re-nationalisation of sovereign powers, whose physiology comes from the necessity of higher national flexibility. Asking how feasible changes in the current set of rules could accommodate the increased demand of national flexibility, the paper focuses on the euro area and proposes to revise the monetary operations of the European Central Bank, current fiscal rules, and the financial regulatory approach. The proposed new design is based on the premise that no changes in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union are possible at the moment, even though a minimum political convergence is necessary. If successfully implemented, the proposal would contribute to give a viable perspective to the design of the Economic and Monetary Union, capable of attracting those EU non-euro area countries that consider the mismanagement of the recent crisis and of its after-effects reason enough for resisting further losses of sovereignty.


JEL: E52, E62, F33, F36, F45, G28



Bibow J. (2015), “Making the euro viable: The Euro Treasury Plan”, Levy Economics Institute Working Papers, n. 842, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson.

Brunnermeier M., Garicano L., Lane P.R., Pagano M., Reis R., Santos T., Thesmar D., Van Nieuwerburgh S. and Vayanos D. (2011), “European Safe Bonds (ESBies)”, mimeo, available at

Europea Central Bank (2011a), The Implementation of Monetary Policy in the Euro Area, Frankfurt am Main, February.

European Central Bank (2011b), “Guideline of the European Central Bank of 20 September 2011on monetary policy instruments and procedures of the Eurosystem (recast) (ECB/2011/14)”, Official Journal of the European Union, L 331, 14 December, p. 1.

European Central Bank (2012), “On the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank”, Official Journal of the European Union, C 326/230, 26 October, p. 1.

European Commission (2015), Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union, Report by Jean-Claude Juncker, in close cooperation with Donald Tusk, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, Mario Draghi and Martin Schulz, Brussels: European Commission.

German Council of Economic Experts (2016), Executive Summary of the Annual Report 2016/17, Time for Reforms, Berlin. Available at:

Gray S., Pongsaparn R. (2015), “Issuance of Central Bank Securities: International Experiences and Guidelines”, IMF Working Papers, n. WP/15/106, Washington (DC).

Issing O. (2013), “The risk of European centralisation”, Project Syndicate, 2 July, available at:

Issing O. (2015), “Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union?”, Project Syndicate, 28 September, available at:

Johnson S. (2016), “A size cap for the largest U.S. banks”, contribution to the symposium on Ending Too Big To Fail, organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 6 April, available at: studies/endingtbtf/april-4-symposium-presentations/johnson-mpls-fed-conference -032816-discussants.pdf

Kattel R., Kregel J., Tonveronachi M. (eds.) (2016), Financial Regulation in the European Union, London: Routledge.

Kregel J. (2012), “Using Minsky to simplify financial regulation”, Research Project Report, n. 4, Levy Economics Institute at Bard College, Annandale-on-Hudson.

Minsky H. (1977), “Banking in a fragile financial environment”, The Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 3 n. 4, pp. 16-22.

Minsky H. (1986), Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, London: Yale University Press.

Montanaro E. (2016), “The process towards the centralisation of the European financial supervisory architecture: the case of the Banking Union”, PSL Quarterly Review, vol. 68 n. 277, pp. 135-172.

Montanaro E., Tonveronachi M. (2012), “Financial re-regulation at a crossroads: How the European experience strengthens the case for a radical reform built on Minsky’s approach”, PSL Quarterly Review, vol. 65 n. 263, pp. 335-383.

Pâris P., Wyplosz C. (2014), “Politically Acceptable Debt Restructuring in the Eurozone (PADRE)”, Geneva Reports on the World Economy Special Report, n. 3, CEPR, Geneva.

Prodi R., Quadrio Curzio A. (2011), “Gold in the past and EuroUnionBond for the future”, Economia Politica, vol. 3, pp. 295-303.

Quadrio Curzio A. (2014), “Eurobonds for EMU stability, convergence and growth”, Cranec Working Papers, n. 1403, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan.

Rule G. (2011), “Issuing central bank securities”, CCBS Handbook, n. 30, Bank of England, London.

Tarullo D. (2014), “Rethinking the aims of prudential regulation”, 50th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.

Tonveronachi M. (2013), “De-globalising bank regulation”, PSL Quarterly Review, vol. 66 n. 267, pp. 371-385.

Tonveronachi M. (2015a), “Making the ECB the central bank of a non-federal coalition of states”, PSL Quarterly Review, vol. 68 n. 273, pp. 91-114.

Tonveronachi M. (2015b), “Revising the European Central Bank’s operations and the euro area fiscal rules to support growth and employment”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 38 n. 4, pp. 495-508.

Tonveronachi M. (2016), “A critical assessment of the EU monetary, fiscal and regulatory framework and a reform proposal”, FESSUD Working Paper Series, n. 132, Leeds University Business School, Leeds.

Yellen J. (2016), “Statement before the Committee on Financial Services”, U.S. House of Representatives, September 28, available at: /newsevents/testimony/yellen20160928a.pdf.




How to Cite

Tonveronachi, M. (2017). Three proposals for revitalising the European Union. PSL Quarterly Review, 69(279), 301–336.