A Post-Kaleckian model with productivity growth and real exchange rate applied to selected Latin American countries





Post-Kaleckian, aggregate demand, real exchange rate, productivity, real wages


This paper aims to discuss the theory of productivity growth and its empirical applications, several authors emphasize the impact of real exchange rate devaluation on productivity. The main research question is: does the real exchange rate have a positive or negative impact on productivity growth? The first step in answering this question is to discuss productivity growth in the context of demand regimes. The second step consists of an empirical experiment that estimates the productivity growth equation for a sample of Latin American countries. The overall outcome is that the Kaldor–Verdoorn coefficient is significant for all the analysed countries, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela. Regarding the real exchange rate and this variable squared, the parameters are negative for all the countries, indicating that real exchange rate devaluation does not increase productivity growth.


JEL codes: O11, O15, O41



Author Biographies

Douglas Alencar, Federal University of Pará

State of Pará

Frederico G Jayme Jr, Federal University of Minas Gerais

State of Minas Gerais

Gustavo Britto, Federal University of Minas Gerais

State of Minas Gerais


Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Thaicharoen, Y. and Robinson, J. 2002. ‘Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symptoms: Volatility, Crisis and Growth’, NBER Working Paper 9124.

Acevedo, A., Mold, A., and Perez, E. 2009. The sectoral drivers of economic growth: a long-term view of Latin American economic performance, Cuadernos Económicos de ICE, vol. 78, 1–26.

Alexiadis, S. and Tsagdis, D. 2010. Is cumulative growth in manufacturing productivity slowing down in the EU12 regions? Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, 1001–17.

Angeriz, A., McCombie, J.S.L. and Roberts, M. 2009. Increasing returns and the growth of industries in the EU regions: paradoxes and conundrums, Spatial Economic Analysis, vol. 4, no. 2, 127–48.

Araújo, E.C. 2009. ‘Nível do câmbio e crescimento econômico: Teorias e evidências para países em desenvolvimento e emergentes, 1980–2007.’ No. 1425. Texto para Discussão, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).

Basilio, F.A.C. and Oreiro, J.L.C. 2015. Wage-led ou profit-led? Análise das estratégias de crescimento das economias sob o regime de metas de inflação, câmbio flexível, mobilidade de capitais e endividamento externo, Economia e Sociedade (UNICAMP. Impresso), vol. 24, 29–56.

Benaroya, F. and Janci, D. 1999. Measuring exchange rates misalignments with purchasing power parity estimates, in Collignon, S., Pisani-Ferry, J. and Park, Y. C. (eds), Exchange Rate Policies in Emerging Asian Countries, New York, Routledge.

Borgoglio, L. and Odisio, J. 2015. La productividad manufacturera en Argentina, Brasil y México: una estimación de la Ley de Kaldor-Verdoorn, 1950-2010, Investigación económica, vol. 74, no. 292, 185–211.

Bragança, A. and Libânio, G.A. 2008. Taxa Real de Câmbio e Crescimento Econômico na América Latina e no Sudeste Asiático, in XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia, Salvador, XXXVI Encontro Nacional de Economia.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C. (ed.). 1991. Populismo Econômico: Ortodoxia, Desenvolvimentismo e Populismo na América Latina, São Paulo, Nobel.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C. 2006. O novo desenvolvimentismo e a ortodoxia convencional, São Paulo em Perspectiva, vol. 20, no. 3, 5–24.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C. 2010. Doença holandesa e indústria, Rio de Janeiro, FGV.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C. 2012. The new developmentalism as a Weberian ideal type, paper in honor of Robert Frenkel, September. Available from http://www.bresserpereira.org.br, accessed 19 December 2013.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C. and Gala, P. 2010. Macroeconomia estruturalista do desenvolvimento, Revista de Economia Política, vol. 30, no. 4, 663–86.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C., Oreiro, J.L. and Marconi, N. 2012. A theoretical framework for a structuralist development macroeconomics, paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Developments in Economic Theory and Policy, Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, Spain.

Bresser-Pereira, L.C., Oreiro, J.L.C. and Marconi, N. 2014. Developmental Macroeconomics: New Developmentalism as a Growth Strategy, 1st ed., London, Routledge. v. 1. 187p.

Britto, G. and McCombie, J.S.L. 2015. Increasing returns to scale and regions: a multilevel model for Brazil, Brazilian Keynesian Review, vol. 1, 118–34.

Carton, C. 2009. ‘Kaldorian Mechanisms of Regional Growth: An Empirical Application to the Case of ALADOI 1980–2007’, MPRA paper, no. 15675.

Cavallo, D.F., Cottani, J.A. and Kahn, M.S. 1990. Real exchange rate behavior and economic performance in LDCS, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 39, October, 61–76.

Destefanis, S. 2002. The Verdoorn law: some evidence from non-parametric frontier analysis, in Productivity Growth and Economic Performance, UK, Palgrave Macmillan, 136–64.

Dixon, R. and Thirlwall, A.P. 1975. A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines. Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 27, no. 2, 201–14.

Dollar, D. 1992. Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: evidence from 95 LDCS, 1976–1985, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 40, 523–44.

Fajnzylber, P., Loayza, N. and Caldero, C. 2002. Economic Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean, Washington, DC, The World Bank.

Ferrari Filho, F. and Fonseca, P.C.D. 2013. Qual Desenvolvimentismo? Uma proposição keynesiana-institucionalista à lawage-led, in XLI Encontro Nacional de Economia, 2013, Foz de Iguaçu, Anais do XLI Encontro Nacional de Economia, Brasília, ANPEC.

Gala, P. 2008. Real exchange rate levels and economic development: theoretical analysis and econometric evidence, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 32, 273–88.

Hein, E. and Tarassow, A. 2010. Distribution, aggregate demand and productivity growth: theory and empirical results for six OECD countries based on a post-Kaleckian model, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 34, no. 4, 727–54.

Krugman, P. and Taylor, L. 1978. Contractionary effects of devaluation, Journal of International Economics, vol. 8, no. 3, 445–56.

Lavoie, M. and Stockhammer, E. 2012. Wage-led growth: concept, theories and policies, project report for the project ‘New Perspectives on Wages and Economic Growth: The Potentials of Wage-Led Growth’, Geneva, International Labour Office.

León-Ledesma, M.A. 2002. Accumulation, innovation and catching-up: an extended cumulative growth model, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 25, 201–16.

Libanio, G. 2006. Manufacturing Industry and Economic Growth in Latin America: A Kaldorian Approach, Brazil, Centro de Desenvolvimento e Planejamento Regional (CEDEPLAR), Federal University of Minas Gerais. Available from: http://www.policyinnovations.org/ideas/policy_library/data/01384/_res/id=sa_File1/Libanio_manufacturing.pdf.

McCombie, J.S.L., Pugno, M. and Soro, B. 2002. Productivity Growth and Economic Performance: Essays on Verdoorn’s Law, Palgrave Macmillan.

Missio, F. and Jayme Jr, F.G. 2013. Restrição externa, nível da taxa real de câmbio e crescimento em um modelo com progresso técnico endógeno, Economia e Sociedade (UNICAMP. Impresso), vol. 22, 367–407.

Missio, F., Jayme Jr, F.G. and Oreiro, J.L. 2015b. The structuralist tradition in economics: methodological and macroeconomics aspects, Revista de Economia Política (Online), vol. 35, 247–66.

Naastepad, C.W.M. 2006. Technology, demand and distribution: application to the Dutch productivity growth slowdown, Cambridge Journal of Economics, no. 30, 403–34.

Naastepad, C.W.M. and Storm, S. 2007. OECD demand regimes (1960–2000), Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics, vol. 29, no. 2, 211–46.

Nassif, A., Feijó, C. and Araújo, E. 2015. Overvaluation trend of the Brazilian currency in the 2000s: empirical estimation, Revista de Economia Política, vol. 35, no. 1, 3–27.

Oliveira, F.H., Jayme Jr, F.G. and Lemos, M.B. 2006. Increasing returns to scale and international diffusion of technology: an empirical study for Brazil (1976–2000), World Development, Canadá, vol. 34, no. 1, 75–88.

Oreiro, J.L.C. and Araújo, E. 2013. Exchange rate misalignment, capital accumulation and income distribution, Panoeconomicus, vol. 3, 381–96.

Rapetti, M., Skott, P. and Razmi, A. 2012. The real exchange rate and economic growth: are developing countries special? International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 26, no. 6, 735–53.

Razin, O. and Collins, S. 1997. ‘Real Exchange Rate Misalignments and Growth’, NBER Working Paper 6147.

Rodrik, D. 2008. Real exchange rate and economic growth, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2, 365–412.

Storm, S. and Naastepad, C.W.M. 2012. Wage-led or profit-led supply: wages, productivity and investment, paper written for the project ‘New Perspectives on Wages and Economic Growth: The Potentials of Wage-Led Growth’.

World Bank. World Development Indicators. Available in < http://www.worldbank.org/>.




How to Cite

Alencar, D., Jayme Jr, F. G., & Britto, G. (2021). A Post-Kaleckian model with productivity growth and real exchange rate applied to selected Latin American countries. PSL Quarterly Review, 74(297). https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/16603




Most read articles by the same author(s)