What do tests of the relationship between employment and technical progress hide?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643_73.295_5Keywords:
employment, labor productivity, technical progress, total factor productivityAbstract
RThe debate about whether technical progress causes technological unemployment, as the Luddites argued in the early 19th century, has recently resurfaced in the context of new technologies and automation and the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. We review the main issues and then consider in detail the studies of Autor and Salomons (2017, 2018). They find that after both direct and indirect effects are accounted for, technical change is, on the aggregate, employment-augmenting. They find no evidence that technical change (proxied by the growth of productivity) reduces employment growth. We demonstrate that the regressions they estimate are problematic because they approximate an accounting identity. One or two variables in the identity (output growth or both output growth and capital growth) are omitted, which implies that the coefficient of productivity growth suffers from omitted-variable bias. As the omitted variable is known, we can have a good idea of what the statistical results must be. We conclude that, unfortunately, their work does not shed light on the question they address.
JEL codes: E24, O30, O47
References
Acemoglu D. and Restrepo P. (2017), “Robots and jobs: Evidence from U.S. labor markets”, NBER Working Paper, n. 23285, Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.
Acemoglu D. and Restrepo P. (2020), “Robots and jobs: Evidence from U.S. labor markets”, Journal of Political Economy, 128 (6), pp. 2188-2244.
Arntz M., Gregory T. and Zierahn U. (2016), “The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, n. 189, Paris: OECD.
Atkinson R.D. and Wu J.J. (2017), “False alarmism: Technological disruption and the U.S. labor market, 1850–2015”, Information Technology & Innovation Foundation @Work Series, May.
Autor D. (2016), “Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29 (3), pp. 3-30.
Autor D. and Salomons A. (2017), “Robocalypse now—Does productivity growth threaten employment?”, ECB Forum on Central Banking, Investment and Growth in Advanced Economies, Sintra (Portugal), June 26-28.
Autor D. and Salomons A. (2018), “Is automation labor share-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 49 (1), pp. 1-63.
Baquee D., Rezza D. and Farhi E. (2019). “JEEA-FBBVA Lecture 2018: The Microeconomic Foundations of Aggregate Production Functions”, Journal of the European Economic Association, 17 (5), pp. 1337–1392.
Bivens J. and Mishel L. (2013), “The pay of corporate executives and financial professionals as evidence of rents in top 1 percent incomes”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (3), pp. 57-78.
Boldrin M. and Levine D.K. (2013), “The case against patents”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27 (1), pp. 3-22.
Bowles S. and Boyer R. (1995), “Wages, aggregate demand, and employment in an open economy: An empirical investigation”, in Epstein G.A., Gintis H.M. (eds.), Macroeconomic policy after the conservative era: Studies in investment, saving and finance, pp. 143-171, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Brynjolfsson E. and McAfee A. (2014), The second machine age, New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company.
Cohen A.J. and Harcourt G.C. (2003), “Retrospectives: Whatever happened to the Cambridge capital theory controversies?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (1), pp. 199-214.
Dao M.C., Das M., Koczan Z. and Lian W. (2017), “Understanding the downward trend in labor income shares”, World Economic Outlook April 2017, Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.
Felipe J. and Fisher F.M. (2003), “Aggregation in production functions: What applied economists should know”, Metroeconomica, 54 (2-3), pp. 208-262.
Felipe J. and McCombie J.S.L. (2001), “Biased technical change, growth accounting, and the conundrum of the East Asian miracle”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 29 (3), pp. 542-565.
Felipe J. and McCombie J.S.L. (2013), The aggregate production function and the measurement of technical change: “Not even wrong”, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar.
Felipe J. and McCombie J.S.L. (2020), “The illusions of calculating total factor productivity and testing growth models: From Cobb-Douglas to Solow and to Romer”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 43 (3), pp. 470-513.
Ferguson C.E. (1968), “Neoclassical theory of technical progress and relative factor shares”, Southern Economic Journal, 34 (4), pp. 490-504.
Fisher F.M. (1971), “Aggregate Production Functions and the Explanation of Wages: A Simulation Experiment”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53 (4), pp. 305–25.
Fisher F.M., Solow R.M. and Kearl J.M. (1977), “Aggregate Production Functions: Some CES Experiments”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 44(2), pp. 305-320.
Fisher F.M. (1993), Aggregation: Aggregate Production Functions and Related Topics, edited by Monz J., Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
Frey C.B. and Osborne M.A. (2013), “The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?”, Oxford Martin Programme on Technology and Employment Working Paper, Oxford (UK): Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
Frey C.B. and Osborne M.A. (2017), “The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114 (C), pp. 254-280.
Guo J. (2017), “We’re so unprepared for the robot apocalypse”, The Washington Post: Wonkblog, March 30.
Haltiwanger J. (2018), “Comment”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 49 (1), pp. 64-71.
Harari Y.N. (2018), “Why technology favors tyranny”, The Atlantic (October).
Harcourt G.C. (1976), “The Cambridge controversies: Old ways and new horizons—or dead end?”, Oxford Economic Papers, 28 (1), pp. 25-65.
Hulten C.R. (2009), “Growth accounting”, NBER Working Paper, n. 15341, Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.
Keynes J.M. (1930), “Economic possibilities for our grandchildren (1930)”, in Essays in persuasion, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jorgenson D.W. and Griliches Z. (1967), “The explanation of productivity growth”, The Review of Economic Studies, 34 (3), pp. 249-283.
Miller C.C. (2017), “Evidence that robots are winning the race for American jobs”, The New York Times: The Upshot, March 28.
Mishel L. and Bivens J. (2017), The zombie robot argument lurches on: There is no evidence that automation leads to joblessness or inequality, Washington (DC): Economic Policy Institute, May 24.
Nadiri M.I. (1970), “Some approaches to the theory and measurement of total factor productivity: A survey”, Journal of Economic Literature, 8 (4), pp. 1137-1177.
Nedelkoska L. and Quintini G. (2018), “Automation, skills use and training”, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper, Paris: OECD, March 14.
Nelson R. (1973), “Recent exercises in growth accounting: New understanding or dead end”, The American Economic Review, 63 (3), pp. 462-468.
O’Mahony M. and Timmer M. (2009), “Output, input and productivity measures at the industry level: The EU KLEMS database”, Economic Journal, 119 (538), pp. F374-F403.
Ricardo D. ([1817-1821] 1951), Principles of political economy and taxation, Sraffa P. (ed.), 3rd ed., Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
Rogerson R. (2018), “Comment”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 49 (1), pp. 71-87.
Solow R. (1956), “A contribution to the theory of economic growth”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), pp. 65-94.
Solow R. (1957), “Technical change and the aggregate production function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), pp. 312-320.
Solow R. (1987), “‘We’d better watch out’, review of Manufacturing Matters: The myth of the post industrial economy by Cohen S. and Zysman J., New York: Basic Books”, The New York Times Book Review, July 12.
Stockhammer E. (2017), “Determinants of the wage share: A panel analysis of advanced and developing economies”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 55 (1), pp. 3-33.
Sylos‐Labini P. (1995), “Why the interpretation of the Cobb‐Douglas production function must be radically changed”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 6 (4), pp. 485-504.
Taylor L. (1996), “Stimulating global employment growth”, in Eatwell J. (ed.), Global Unemployment, Armonk (New York): M.E. Sharpe, pp. 143-172.
Veblen T. (1899), The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions, New York: Macmillan.
World Bank (2016), World development report 2016: Digital dividends, Washington (DC): The World Bank Group.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
