Land-constrained growth in a developing economy: A Kaldorian perspective

Authors

  • Isha Gupta Ramanujan College (University of Delhi) & Centre for Economic Studies and Planning (CESP), Jawaharlal Nehru University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/17614

Keywords:

Two-sector Growth Model, Agriculture, Industry, Land-constraint, Balanced Growth Path

Abstract

The paper develops a two-sector model of economic growth, using agriculture and industry. The distinguishing feature in this analysis is that land is an essential input in the agricultural sector, but it is also used in the production process of industrial sector, which is assumed to be imperfectly competitive. The significant role of land allocations is highlighted for a developing economy like India, where any constraint on land transfers from agricultural to non-agricultural sectors imposes a constraint on the overall growth process of the economy. Using the two-sector Kaldorian framework, we analyse the complementary interactions between agriculture and industry through trade flows, labour movements, and land transfers in this setup. We characterize the balanced growth path for such an economy in the long run using two scenarios: a) equilibrium growth with fixed distribution of land by the centralized authority in each sector and b) equilibrium growth with inter-sectoral land transfers accompanied by land-saving innovations in each sector.

References

Adelman I. (1984), “Beyond export-led growth”, World development, 12 (9), pp. 937-949.

Bhaduri A. and Skarstein R. (2003), “Effective demand and the terms of trade in a dual economy: a Kaldorian perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27 (4), pp. 583-595.

Binswanger-Mkhize H.P. (2012), “India 1960-2010: Structural change, the rural non-farm sector, and the prospects for agriculture”, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Berkeley: University of California, available at: https://are.berkeley.edu/documents/seminar/Binswanger.pdf

Canning D. (1988), “Increasing Returns in Industry and the Role of Agriculture in Growth”, Oxford Economic Papers, 40 (3), pp. 463-476.

Chatterjee M. (2020), “Non-farm futures and the dispossessed: Mapping manual labour in an industrial area in India”, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47 (6), pp. 1165-1188.

Das R. (2021), “Farm Size and Productivity Debate in Indian Agriculture: Five Decades of Green Revolution”, Women’s Agency in Noth East India, 56 (9), pp. 57-65.

Deshpande T. (2017), “State of agriculture in India”, PRS Legislative Research, 53 (8), pp. 6-7.

Dutt A.K. (1992), “A Kaldorian model of growth and development revisited: A comment on Thirlwall”, Oxford Economic Papers, 44 (1), pp. 156-168.

Government of India (2019), Agriculture Census 2015-16 (Phase-I), All India Report on Number and Area of Operational Holdings, New Delhi: Agriculture Census Division, Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, available at: https://agcensus.nic.in/document/agcen1516/T1_ac_2015_16.pdf

Government of India (2021), “Situation Assessment of Agricultural Households and Land and Livestock Holdings of Households in Rural India, 2019”, NSS Report, No. 587, New Delhi: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, National Statistic Office, available at: https://www.mospi.gov.in/documents/213904/301563//Report_587m1631267040957.pdf/

Hirschman A.O. and Sirkin G. (1958), “Investment criteria and capital intensity once again”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72 (3), pp. 469-471.

Jha R. (2010), “The analytics of the agriculture-industry relationship in a closed economy: A case study of India”, Economic and Political Weekly, 45 (17), pp. 94-98.

Jorgenson D.W. (1961), “The development of a dual economy”, The Economic Journal, 71 (282), pp. 309-334.

Johnston B.F. and Mellor J.W. (1961), “The role of agriculture in economic development”, The American Economic Review, 51 (4), pp. 566-593.

Kainth G.S. and Bawa R.S. (2013), “Productivity of Indian Agriculture: Growth and Determinantes”, Working Paper, no. 253311, Amritsar: Guru Arjan Dev Institute of Development Studies.

Kaldor N. (1957), “A model of economic growth”, The Economic Journal, 67 (268), pp. 591-624.

Kaldor N. (1972), “The irrelevance of equilibrium economics”, The Economic Journal, 82 (328), pp. 1237-1255.

Kaldor N. (1975), “What is wrong with economic theory”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89 (3), pp. 347-357.

Kaldor N. (1976), “Inflation and recession in the world economy”, The Economic Journal, 86 (344), pp. 703-714.

Kaldor N. (1979), “Equilibrium theory and growth theory”, in Boskin M.J. (ed.), Economics and Human Welfare: Essays in Honor of Tibor Scitovski (pp. 273-291), London: Academic Press.

Kaldor N. ([1984] 1996), Causes of Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy, Five Mattioli Lectures, Bocconi University, Milan, 21-24 May; published (1996), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kalecki M. (1960), Unemployment in Underdeveloped Countries, Lucknow: University of Lucknow.

Kalecki M. (1971), Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy 1933-1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuznets S.S. (1968), Toward a Theory of Economic Growth: With Reflections on the Economic Growth of Modern Nations, New York: W.W. Norton.

Levien M. (2013a), “The land question: special economic zones and the political economy of dispossession in India”, in White B., Borras Jr.S., Hall R., Scoones I. and Wolford W. (eds.), The New Enclosures: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Land Deals (pp. 327-364), London: Routledge.

Levien M. (2013b), “Regimes of dispossession: From steel towns to special economic zones”, Development and Change, 44 (2), pp. 381-407.

Levien M. (2015), “From primitive accumulation to regimes of dispossession: Six theses on India’s land question”, Economic and Political Weekly, 50 (22), pp. 146-157.

Lewis W.A. (1954), “Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour”, The Manchester School, 22 (2), pp. 139-191.

Maxwell S.J. and Singer H.W. (1979), “Food aid to developing countries: a survey”, World Development, 7 (3), pp. 225-246.

McCombie J. and Roberts M. (2008), “Effective-Demand-Constrained Growth in a Two-Sector Kaldorian Model”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 31 (1), pp. 57-78.

Mellor J.W. (1976), The New Economics of Growth: A Strategy for India and the Developing World, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.

MINT (2014), “India’s agricultural yield suffers from low productivity”, 9 September, available at: https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/nw9JKiPrDPpqCuWfmoibPN/Indias-agricultural-yield-suffers-from-low-productivity.html

MINT (2018), “The land challenge underlying India’s farm crisis”, 15 October, available at: https://www.livemint.com/Politics/SOG43o5ypqO13j0QflaawM/The-land-challenge-underlying-Indias-farm-crisis.html

Molana H. and Vines D. (1989), “North-south growth and the terms of trade: a model on Kaldorian lines”, The Economic Journal, 99 (396), pp. 443-453.

NITI (National Institutions for Transforming India) Aayog (2015), “Raising agricultural productivity and making farming remunerative for farmers”, Occasional Paper, 16 December, New Delhi: NITI Aayog and Government of India.

Ranis G. (1984), “Determinants and consequences of indigenous technological activity”, in Fransman M. and King K. (eds.) Technological Capability in the Third World (pp. 95-112), London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ranis G. and Fei J.C. (1961), “A theory of economic development”, The American Economic Review, 51 (4), pp. 533-565.

Rosenstein-Rodan P.N. (1943), “Problems of industrialisation of eastern and south-eastern Europe”, The Economic Journal, 53 (210/211), pp. 202-211.

Sanyal A. and Singh N. (2021), “Structural Change and Economic Growth: Patterns and Heterogeneity among Indian States and Implications for a Post-COVID Recovery”, in Shah S., Bosworth B. and Muralidharan K. (eds.), India Policy Forum 2020: Volume 17 (pp. 143-198), New Delhi: Sage Publishing.

Scitovsky T. (1954), “Two concepts of external economies”, Journal of political Economy, 62 (2), pp. 143-151.

Skott P. (1999), “Growth and stagnation in a two-sector model: Kaldor's Mattioli Lectures”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23 (3), pp. 353-370.

Sud N. (2014), “Governing India’s land”, World Development, 60, pp. 43-56.

Sud N. (2017), “State, scale and networks in the liberalisation of India’s land”, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35 (1), pp. 76-93.

Targetti F. (1985), “Growth and the Terms of Trade: A Kaldorian two sector Model”, Metroeconomica, 37, pp. 79-96.

Thirlwall A.P. (1986), “A general model of growth and development on Kaldorian lines”, Oxford Economic Papers, 38 (2), pp. 199-219.

Vogel S.J. (1994), “Structural changes in agriculture: production linkages and agricultural demand-led industrialization”, Oxford Economic Papers, 46 (1), pp. 136-156.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-21

How to Cite

Gupta, I. (2022). Land-constrained growth in a developing economy: A Kaldorian perspective. PSL Quarterly Review, 75(302), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/17614