Managing commodity booms: Dutch disease and economic performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/17671Keywords:
commodity booms, Dutch disease, structural change, economic policyAbstract
Commodity booms are usually associated with commodity-exporting countries suffering from real exchange rate appreciation and negative economic consequences, that is, Dutch disease. Yet, there are different ways to manage or not manage the commodity rent earned via exports. Based on a monetary theory of exchange rates and a heterogenous sample of countries, this analysis shows that Dutch disease during commodity booms is not an inevitable outcome. Different macroeconomic characteristics of countries give way to different outcomes. In particular, richer countries, countries with trade surplus as well as those with a history of low inflation are better equipped to avoid real appreciation. Evidence unambiguously shows that countries with real appreciation experience structural change away from manufacturing toward less productive sectors such as construction. Macroeconomic dynamics and political economy factors make it more difficult for developing countries to make long-term use of the rent gained during commodity booms.
References
Aslam A., Beidas-Strom S., Bems R., Celasun O., Celik S.K. and Kóczán Z. (2016), “Trading on their terms? Commodity exporters in the aftermath of the commodity boom”, International Monetary Fund Working Paper, n. 16/27. Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.
Blecker R.A. and M. Setterfield (2019), Heterodox macroeconomics: Models of demand, distribution and growth, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Boyer R. (2015), Économie politique des capitalismes. Théorie de la régulation et des crises, Paris: La découverte.
Bresser-Pereira L.C. (2016), “Reflecting on new developmentalism and classical developmentalism”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 4 (3), pp. 331-352.
Bresser-Pereira L.C. (2018), “Neutralizing the Dutch Disease”, Sao Paulo School of Economics Working Paper, n. 476, Sao Paulo: Sao Paulo School of Economics.
Bresser-Pereira L.C. (2020), “New developmentalism: Development macroeconomics for middle-income countries”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44, pp. 629-646.
Bruno M., Halevi J. and J. Marques Pereira (2011), “Les défis de l’influence de la Chine sur le développement du Brésil: avantages comparatifs et conflit distributif”, Revue Tiers Monde, 208, pp. 83-102.
Cencini A. (2000), “World monetary disorders: exchange rate Erratic Fluctuations”, Centro di Studi Bancari Quaderni di Ricerca, n. 2, Lugano: Centro di Studi Bancari.
Cimoli M. and Porcile G. (2016), “Productivity and structural change: structuralism and its dialogue with other heterodox currents”, in Bárcena A. and Prado A. (eds), Neostructuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century, Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), pp. 205-222.
Combes J.-L., Kinda T. and Plane P. (2012), “Capital flows, exchange rate flexibility, and the real exchange rate”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 34, pp. 1034-1043.
Corden W.M. (1984), “Booming sector and Dutch disease economics: survey and consolidation”, Oxford Economic Papers, 36 (3), November, pp. 359-380.
Corden W.M. and Neary J.P. (1982), “Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy”, The Economic Journal, 92 (368), pp. 825-848.
Daway-Ducanes S.L.S. (2019), “Remittances, Dutch disease, and manufacturing growth in developing economies”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 66 (3), pp. 360-383.
Dornbusch R. (1976), “Expectations and Exchange Rate Dynamics”, Journal of Political Economy, 84 (6), pp. 1161-1176.
Esfahani H.S., Facchini G. and G.J.D. Hewings (2010), Economic Development in Latin America: Essay in Honor of Werner Baer, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gabriel L.F. and Ribeiro L.C.S. (2019), “Economic Growth and Manufacturing: An Analysis Using Panel VAR and Intersectoral Linkages”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49, pp. 43-61.
Gabriel L.F., Ribeiro L.C.S., Jayme F.G. and Oreiro J.L.C. (2020), “Manufacturing, economic growth, and real exchange rate: Empirical evidence in panel data and input-output multipliers”, PSL Quarterly Review, 73 (292), pp. 51-75.
Gruss B. and S. Kebhaj (2019), “Commodity terms of trade: A new database”, International Monetary Fund Working Paper, no. 21, Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.
Guzman M., Ocampo J.A. and Stiglitz J.E. (2018), “Real exchange rate policies for economic development”, World Development, 110, pp. 51-62.
Harvey J.T. (2005), “Post Keynesian versus neoclassical explanations of exchange rate movements: a short look at the long run”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 28 (2), pp. 161-179.
Ismail K. (2010), “The structural manifestation of the ‘Dutch Disease’: The case of oil exporting countries”, International Monetary Fund Working Paper n. 10/103, Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.
Jbir R. and Zouari-Ghorbel S. (2011), “Oil price and Dutch Disease: The case of Algeria”, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6 (3), pp. 280-293.
Kaltenbrunner A. (2015), “A post Keynesian framework of exchange rate determination: A Minskyan approach”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 38 (3), pp. 426-448.
Lartey E.K.K. (2011), “Financial openness and the Dutch Disease”, Review of Development Economics, 15 (3), pp. 556-568.
Lartey E.K.K., Mandelman F.S. and Acosta P.A. (2012), “Remittances, exchange rate régimes and Dutch Disease : A panel data analysis”, Review of International Economics, 20 (2), pp. 377-395.
Libman E., Montecino J.A. and Razmi A. (2019), “Sustained investment surges”, Oxford Economic Papers, 71 (4), pp. 1071-1095.
McCombie J.S.L. and Thirlwall A.P. (1997), “Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraint revisited”, in Arestis P., Palma G. and Sawyer M. (eds.), Markets, unemployment and economic policy: Essays in honour of Geoff Harcourt, vol. 2, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 498-511.
Medeiros C.A. (2020), “A structuralist and institutionalist developmental assessment of and reaction to New Developmentalism”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 8 (2), pp. 147-167.
Mhlongo E. and Nell K.S. (2019), “Growth transitions and the balance-of-payments constraint”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 7 (4), pp. 498-516.
Ndikumana L. and Boyce J.K. (2018), “Capital flight from Africa: Updated methodology and new estimates”, Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) Research Report, University of Massachusetts-Amherst: Political Economy Research Institute.
Oberholzer B. (2020), Development Macroeconomics: Alternative Strategies for Growth, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Ojapinwa T.V. and Nwokoma N.I. (2018), “Workers’ remittances and the Dutch-Disease argument: Investigating the relationship in sub-saharan Africa”, African Development Review, 30 (3), pp. 316-324.
Oreiro J.L., Manarin D’Agostini L.L. and Gala P. (2020), “Deindustrialization, economic complexity and exchange rate overvaluation: the case of Brazil (1998-2017)”, PSL Quarterly Review, 73 (295), pp. 313-341.
Pérez Caldentey E. (2016), “A time to reflect on opportunities for debate and dialogue between (neo)structuralism and heterodox schools of thought”, in Bárcena A. and Prado A. (eds.), Neostructuralism and heterodox thinking in Latin America and the Caribbean in the early twenty-first century, pp. 31-85, Santiago: Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC).
Page J. (2012), “Can Africa industrialise?”, Journal of African Economies, vol. 21, AERC Supplement 2, pp. ii86-ii125.
Pigeaud F. and Sylla N.S. (2021), The last colonial currency: A history of the Franc CFA, London: Pluto Press.
Rangarajan C. and Prasad A. (2008), “Capital flows, exchange rate management and monetary policy”, Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economics, 1 (1), pp. 135-149.
Rangasamy L. and Mihaljek D. (2011), “Capital flows, commodity price movements and foreign exchange intervention”, Bank of International Settlements Papers, n. 56, pp. 63-80.
Rodrik D. (2008), “Real exchange rate and economic growth”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 39 (2), pp. 365-439.
Rodrik D. (2015), “Premature Deindustrialization”, Journal of Economic Growth, 21 (1), pp. 1-33.
Roodman D. (2009), “How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata”, The Stata Journal, 9 (1), pp. 86-136.
Sarich J. (2006), “What do we know about the real exchange rate? A classical cost of production story”, Review of Political Economy, 18 (4), pp. 469-496.
Shaikh A. (2016), Capitalism: competition, conflict, crises, New York: Oxford University Press.
Sivramkrishna S. (2016), “Can a country really go broke? Deconstructing Saudi Arabia’s macroeconomic crisis”, Real-World Economics Review, 76, pp. 75-94.
Slack K. (2010), “The role of mining in the economies of developing countries: Time for a new approach”, in Richards J. (ed.), Mining, society, and a sustainable world, Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Szirmai A. and Verspagen B. (2015), “Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950-2005”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 34, pp. 46-59.
Tregenna F. (2009), “Characterising deindustrialisation: An analysis of changes in manufacturing employment and output internationally”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33, pp. 433-466.
UNCTAD (2020), “International merchandise trade”, UNCTAD Data Center. Available at: https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx
Velculescu D. (2008), “IMF survey: Norway’s oil fund shows the way for wealth funds”, International Monetary Fund. Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/28/04/53/sopol070908a
World Integrated Trade Solution [WITS] (2021), Trade Statistics by Indicator, available at: https://wits.worldbank.org/Default.aspx
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Basil Oberholzer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
