The theory of monetary disorder: debt finance, existing assets, and the consequences of prolonged ultra-easy policy

Authors

  • Thomas Palley Economics for Democratic and Open Societies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18265

Keywords:

Monetary disorder, Twin circuits, inflation, asset price bubbles, budget deficits, modern money theory

Abstract

This paper introduces the notion of monetary disorder. The underlying theory rests on a twin circuits view of the macro economy. The idea of monetary disorder has relevance for understanding the experience and consequences of the recent decade-long period of monetized large budget deficits and ultra-easy monetary policy. Current policy rests on Keynesian logic whereby a large fall in aggregate demand warrants robust offsetting monetary and fiscal policy actions. That logic neglects potential monetary disorder being bred within the financial circuit in the form of inflated asset prices and leveraged balance sheets. That disorder is likely to develop long before inflation accelerates so that inflation targeting fails to protect against it. Political factors increase the policy danger as the benefits of disorder are front-loaded and the costs backloaded. The paper concludes with a policy discussion regarding how to prevent Keynesian goods market counter-cyclical stabilization policy from causing monetary disorder.

References

Bezemer D., Gydaki M. and Zhang L. (2016), “More mortgages, lower growth?” Economic Inquiry, 54 (1), pp. 652-674.

Bossone B. (2023), “Moden money theory: why it can’t work (and where it might)”, World Economics, 24 (4), pp. 39-59.

Brainard W, and Tobin J. (1968), “Pitfalls in financial model building”, American Economic Review, 58 (May), pp. 99-122.

Brainard W. and Tobin J. (1977), “Asset markets and the cost of capital”, in B. Belassa and R. Nelson (eds.), Economic Progress, Private Values, and Public Policy: Essays in Honor of William Fellner, New York: North Holland Publishing Co.

Cagan P. (1956), “The monetary dynamics of hyperinflation”, in Friedman M. (ed.), Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dullien S. and Tober S. (2022), “A monetary Keynesian view of modern money theory”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 19 (2), pp. 222-237.

Dutt A.K. (1987), “Alternative closures again: a comment on growth, distribution and inflation”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 11 (1), pp. 75-82.

Eggertsson G.B. and Krugman P. (2012), “Debt, deleveraging, and the liquidity trap: a Fisher-Minsky-Koo approach”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127 (3), pp. 1469-1513.

Epstein G. A. (2019), What’s Wrong with Modern Money Theory? A Policy Critique, Cham (Switzerland): Palgrave Macmillan.

Ferlito C. (2013), “The natural cycle: why economic fluctuations are inevitable. A Schumpeterian extension of the Austrian business cycle theory”, Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 3, pp. 200-219.

Fumagalli A. and Lucarelli S. (2011), “A financialized economy of monetary production”, International Journal of Political Economy, 40 (1), pp. 48-68.

Hansen A.H. (1939), “Economic progress and declining population growth”, American Economic Review, 29 (1), pp. 1-15.

Hayek F.A. (1932), Prices and Production, London: G. Routledge & Sons.

Hein E. (2016), “Secular stagnation or stagnation policy? A post-Steindlian view”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 13 (2), pp. 160-171.

Hein E. (2023), “Inflation is always and everywhere... a conflict phenomenon: post-Keynesian inflation theory and energy price driven conflict inflation”, Working Paper No. 224, Berlin: Institute for International Political Economy, Berlin School of Economics and Law.

Hicks J.R. (1937), “Mr. Keynes and the ‘Classics’; A suggested interpretation”, Econometrica, 5, pp. 147-159.

Kaldor N. (1982), The Scourge of Monetarism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kelton S. (2020), The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy, New York: Public Affairs.

Keynes J.M. (1930), A Treatise on Money, London: MacMillan & Co.

Keynes J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: MacMillan & Co.

Kindleberger C.P. (1978), Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Koo R.C. (2011), “The world in balance sheet recession: causes, cure, and politics”, Real-World Economics Review, No. 58, pp. 19-37.

Kotz D.M. and Basu D. (2019), “Stagnation and institutional structures”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 51 (1), pp. 5-30.

Krippner G. (2004) “What is financialization?” mimeo, Department of Sociology, UCLA.

Lavoie M. (2014), Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar.

Minsky H.P. (1975), John Maynard Keynes, New York: Columbia University Press.

Moore B.J. (1988), Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Palley T.I. (1993), “Milton Friedman and the Monetarist Counter Revolution: A Reappraisal,” Eastern Economic Journal, 19 (1) (Winter), pp. 71 81.

Palley T.I. (1994), “Debt, aggregate demand, and the business cycle: an analysis in the spirit of Kaldor and Minsky”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 16 (Spring), pp. 371 390.

Palley T.I. (1995), “The Demand for Money and Non GDP Transactions,” Economics Letters, 48, pp. 145 154.

Palley T.I. (1997), “Endogenous money and the business cycle”, Journal of Economics, 65, pp. 133 149.

Palley T.I. (1998a), “The twin circuits: aggregate demand and the expenditure multiplier in a monetary economy”, Review of Radical Political Economics, 30 (September), pp. 95-104.

Palley T.I. (1998b), “Walras’ law and Keynesian macroeconomics”, Australian Economic Papers, 37 (September), pp. 330-340.

Palley T.I. (2002), “Economic contradictions coming home to roost? Does the U.S. face a long-term aggregate demand generation problem?” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25 (Fall), pp. 9-32.

Palley T.I. (2003), “Asset price bubbles and the case for asset-based reserve requirements,” Challenge, 46 (May-June), pp. 53-72.

Palley T.I. (2004), “Asset based reserve requirements: reasserting domestic monetary control in an era of financial innovation and instability”, Review of Political Economy, 16 (January), pp. 43-58.

Palley T.I. (2008), “Financialization: what it is and why it matters,” in Eckhard Hein, Torsten Niechoj, Peter Spahn, and Achim Truger (eds.), Finance-led Capitalism: Macroeconomic Effects of Changes in the Financial Sector, Marburg, Germany: Metroplis-Verlag, and Working Paper 153/2007, Amherst (MA): Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts; available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1124&context=peri_workingpapers

Palley T.I. (2011a), “A theory of Minsky super-cycles and financial crise”, Contributions to Political Economy, 30 (1), pp. 31-46.

Palley T.I. (2011b), “America’s flawed paradigm: macroeconomic causes of the financial crisis and Great Recession”, Empirica, 38 (1), pp. 3-17.

Palley T.I. (2012), From Financial Crisis to Stagnation: The Destruction of Shared Prosperity and the Role of Economics, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

Palley T.I. (2013), “Europe’s crisis without end: The consequences of neoliberalism”, Contributions to Political Economy, 32, pp. 29-50.

Palley T.I. (2016), “Why negative interest rate policy (NIRP) is ineffective and dangerous”, Real World Economics Review, No. 76, 5-15, http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue76/Palley76.pdf

Palley T.I. (2018), “Negative interest rate policy (NIRP) and the fallacy of the natural rate of interest: Why NIRP may worsen Keynesian unemployment,” Investigacion Economica, 77, pp. 7-39.

Palley T.I. (2020), “What’s wrong with modern money theory (MMT): macro and political economic restraints on deficit financed fiscal policy,” Review of Keynesian Economics, 8 (4), pp. 472-493.

Palley T.I. (2021), “Financialization revisited: the economics and political economy of the vampire squid economy”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 9 (4), pp. 461-492.

Palley T.I. (2023), “Broadening the application of hysteresis in economics: institutions, policy lock-in, psychology, identity, and ideas”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 11 (4), pp. 460-488.

Philips A.W. (1958), “The relationship between unemployment and the rate of change of money wage rates in the U.K., 1861–1957”, Economica, 25 (November), pp. 283-299.

Rowthorn R.E. (1977), “Conflict, inflation, and money”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1, pp. 215-239.

Schumpeter J. A. (2009 [1951]), Essays: On Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

Summers L.H. (2014), “U.S. economic prospects: secular stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound”, Business Economics, 49 (2), pp. 65-73.

Toporowski J. (1997), “Monetary policy in an era of capital market inflation”, Working Paper No. 279, Annandale-on-Hudson (NY): The Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Bard College.

Vernengo M. and Pérez Caldentey E. (2020), “Modern money theory (MMT) in the tropics: functional finance in developing countries”, Challenge, 63 (6), pp. 332-348.

Werner R.A. (2012), “Towards a new research programme on ‘banking and the economy’ – Implications of the Quantity Theory of Credit for the prevention and resolution of banking and debt crises”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 25 (December), pp. 1-17.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-06

How to Cite

Palley, T. (2024). The theory of monetary disorder: debt finance, existing assets, and the consequences of prolonged ultra-easy policy. PSL Quarterly Review, 76(307), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18265

Issue

Section

Articles