The social reproduction of labour and macro theory
A compelling and fruitful conjunction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18650Keywords:
Social reproduction of labour, human capacities, feminist macroeconomics, first Harrod problem, distribution and growthAbstract
The thesis advanced in this paper is that like class and technical change, gender and the social reproduction of labour routinely shape demand formation and/or the supply side of the economy — and as such, reference to the gendered social reproduction of labour should be more routinely incorporated into macro-theoretic analysis. The argument is developed with reference to two familiar issues in heterodox macrodynamics: reconciliation of the equilibrium and natural rates of growth; and the relationship between distribution and growth. Using an existing feminist macro model as a point of departure, it is shown that proper account of the social reproduction of labour and its gendered character creates important new insights into both the processes by which the equilibrium and natural rates of growth might be equalized, and the underlying character (wage- versus profit-led) of the relationship between distribution and growth.
References
Blades D., Ferreira F.H. and Lugo M.A. (2011), “The informal economy in developing countries: An introduction”, Review of Income and Wealth, 57, pp. S1-S7.
Blecker R.A. and Braunstein E. (2022), “Feminist perspectives on care and macroeconomic modeling: Introduction to the special issue”, Feminist Economics, 28(3), pp. 1-22.
Braunstein E., van Staveren I. and Tavani D. (2011), “Embedding care and unpaid work in macroeconomic modeling: A structuralist approach”, Feminist Economics, 77(4), pp. 5-31.
Braunstein E., Bouhia R. and Seguino S. (2020), “Social reproduction, gender equality and economic growth”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(1), pp. 129-156.
Braunstein E., Seguino S. and Altringer L. (2021), “Estimating the role of social reproduction in economic growth”, International Journal of Political Economy, 50(2), pp. 143-164.
Elson D. (1995), “Male bias in macro-economics: The case of structural adjustment”, in Elson D. (ed.), Male Bias in the Development Process (pp. 164-190), Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Folbre N. (1994), Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint, London: Routledge.
Folbre N. (2023), “Telling fortunes: Feminist theory and the future of political economy”, Review of Political Economy, 35(1), pp. 129-144.
Heintz J. and Folbre N. (2022), “Endogenous growth, population dynamics, and economic structure: Long-run macroeconomics when demography matters”, Feminist Economics, 28(3), pp. 145-163.
Onaran O., Oyvat C. and Fotopoulou E. (2022a), “Gendering macroeconomic analysis and development policy: A theoretical model”, Feminist Economics, 28(3), pp. 23-55.
Onaran O., Oyvat C. and Fotopoulou E. (2022b), “A macroeconomic analysis of the effects of gender inequality, wages, and public social infrastructure: The case of the UK”, Feminist Economics, 28(2), pp. 152-188.
Onaran O., Oyvat C. and Fotopoulou E. (2023), “The effects of gender inequality, wages, wealth concentration and fiscal policy on macroeconomic performance”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, forthcoming.
Oyvat C. and Onaran O. (2022), “The effects of social infrastructure and gender equality on output and employment: The case of South Korea”, World Development, 158, 105987.
Rada C., Santetti M., Schiavone A. and von Arnim R. (2021), “Post-Keynesian vignettes on secular stagnation: From labor suppression to natural growth”, Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah, n. 2021-05, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
Seguino S. (2020), “Engendering macroeconomic theory and policy”, Feminist Economics, 26(2), pp. 27-61.
Serra G.P. (2021), “Three Essays on Human Capital Formation and Student Loans”, Ph. D. thesis, New School For Social Research.
Setterfield M. (2023), “Post-Keynesian growth theory and the supply side: a feminist approach”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 20(2), pp. 299-316.
Vasudevan R. and Raghavendra S. (2022), “Women's self-employment as a developmental strategy: The dual constraints of care work and aggregate demand”, Feminist Economics, 28(3), pp. 56-83.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mark Setterfield
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
