Complex systems: Introductory notes on a dialogue among political economy, evolutionary economics and physics

Authors

  • Eduardo da Motta e Albuquerque Center for Development and Regional Planning (CEDPLAR) and Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18651

Keywords:

technological revolutions, periphery, complex systems, metamorphoses of capitalism, simulation models

Abstract

Complex systems may be a useful methodological tool to address “challenges for research in development”. There is a huge and growing literature on complex systems and economic theory that might be related to early intuitions of classical economists on the workings of capitalist economies. Kondratiev and Slutsky have worked with features of complex systems – how technological revolutions change the system. This may underlie one peculiarity of capitalism – a complex system that changes its level of complexity over time. The inclusion of the periphery broadens its turbulent nature: a complex system that combines regions with self-organization dynamics – the center – and regions with random behavior – the periphery.

References

Adelman I. (1965), “Long cycles: fact or artifact?”, American Economic Review, 55 (3), pp. 444-463.

Albuquerque E.M. (2019a), “Capitalismo pós-www: uma discussão introdutória sobre uma nova fase na economia global”, Cadernos do Desenvolvimento, 14 (24), pp. 131-154.

Albuquerque E.M. (2019b), “Brazil and the middle-income trap: its historical roots”, Seoul Journal of Economics, 32, pp. 23-62.

Albuquerque E.M. (2023), Technological revolutions and the periphery: understanding global development through regional lenses, Cham: Springer. Available online.

Amsden A. (1989), Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson P.W. (1972), “More is different: broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchical structure in science”, Science, 177 (4047), pp. 393-396.

Anderson P.W. (1988), “A physicist looks at economics: an overview of the workshop”, in Anderson P.W., Arrow K.J., Pines D. (eds), The economy as an evolving complex system (pp. 265-274), Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Anderson P.W. (1997), “Some thoughts about distribution in economics”, in Arthur B., Durlauf S.N., Lane D.A. (eds), The economy as an evolving complex system II (pp. 565-566), Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Anderson P.W., Arrow K.J., Pines D. (eds) (1988), The economy as an evolving complex system. Boca Raton: CRC Press,

Arrow K.J. (1988), “Workshop on economy as an evolving complex system: summary”, in Anderson P.W., Arrow K.J., Pines D. (eds), The economy as an evolving complex system (pp. 275-282), Boca Raton: CRC Press,.

Arthur B. (1988a), “Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics”, in Anderson P.W., Arrow K.J., Pines D. (eds), The economy as an evolving complex system (pp. 9-31). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Arthur B. (1988b), “Competing technologies: an overview”, in Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L. (eds), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 590-607), London: Pinter.

Arthur B. (2015), Complexity and the economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Arthur B. (2021), “Foundations of complexity economics”, Nature Review Physics, 3 (2), pp. 136-145.

Bain J. (1956), Barriers to new competition, Harvard: Harvard University.

Beckert S. (2014), Empire of cotton: a global history, New York: Vintage Books.

Cardoso F.G., Lima G.T. (2008), “A construção de Keynes do sistema econômico como um todo orgânico complexo”, Economia e Sociedade, 17, pp. 359-381.

Chandler A.D. Jr (1977), The Visible Hand - The Managerial Revolution in America Business, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Chaves C.V., Ribeiro L.C., Santos U.P., Albuquerque E.M. (2020), “Innovation systems and changes in the core-periphery divide: notes on a methodology to determine countries’ trajectories using science and technology statistics” Cepal Review, 130, pp. 43-61.

Cimini F., Britto J.N. P., Ribeiro L.C. (2020), “Complexity systems and middle-income trap: the long-term roots of Latin America underdevelopment”, Nova Economia, 30, pp. 1225-1256.

Cohen W., Levinthal D. (1989), “Innovation and Learning: the two faces of R&D”, The Economic Journal, 99 (397), pp. 569-596.

Dosi G. (1997), “Opportunities, incentives and collective patterns of technological change”, The Economic Journal, 107, pp. 1530-1547.

Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L. (eds) (1988), Technical change and economic theory, London: Pinter.

Duménil G., Lévy D. ([1994] 2015), “The U.S. Economy since the Civil War: Sources and Construction of the Series”, CEPREMAP. (1994). Available online.

Elsner W. (2017), “Complexity as heterodoxy: theory and policy”, Journal of Economic Issues, 51 (4), pp. 939-978.

Foley D. (2003), The unholy trinity: labor, capital, land in the new economy, New York: Routledge.

Fontana M. (2010), “The Santa Fé perspective on economics: emerging patterns in the science of complexity”, History of Economic Ideas, 18 (2), pp. 167-196.

Franco M.P.V, Ribeiro L.C., Albuquerque E.M. (2022), “Beyond random causes: harmonic analysis of business cycles at the Moscow Conjuncture Institute”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 44(3), pp. 456-476.

Freeman C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Pinter Publishers.

Freeman C., Louçã F. (2001), As time goes by: from the industrial revolution to the information revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Freeman C., Perez C. (1988), “Structural crisis of adjustment: business cycles and investment behavior”, in Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., Soete L. (eds), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 38-66), London: Pinter.

Furtado C. (1987), “Underdevelopment: to conform or to reform”, in Meier G. (ed.), Pioneers of development. Second Series (pp. 205-227), Oxford: Oxford University Press/World Bank.

Furtado C. (1992), Brasil: a construção interrompida, São Paulo/Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.

Furtado C. (2002), Metamorfoses do Capitalismo, Speech at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro on receiving the title of Doctor Honoris Causa, Rio de Janeiro. Available online.

Goldenfeld N. and Kadanoff L.P. (1999), “Simple lessons from complexity”, Science, 284, pp. 87-89.

Granger C.W.J. (1966), “The typical spectra shape of an economic variable”, Econometrica, 34 (1), pp. 150-161.

Hamilton A. (1791), Report on Manufactures. Washington: Senate (1913).

Hidalgo C. (2021), “Economic complexity theory and applications”, Nature Review Physics, 3 (2), pp. 92-113.

Kondratiev N.D. (1926), “Long cycles of economic conjuncture”, in Makasheva N., Samuels W., Barnett V. (eds), The works of Nikolai D. Kondratiev (pp. 25-60), London: Pickering and Chatto (1998).

Langlois R. (2023), The Corporation and the Twentieth Century: The History of American Business Enterprise, Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Lee K. (2013), Schumpeterian analysis of economic catch up: knowledge, path-creation, and the middle-income trap, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee K. (2019), The Art of Economic Catch-Up: barriers, detours and leapfrogging, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Louçã F. (1999), “Nikolai Kondratiev and the early consensus and dissensions about the history and statistics”, History of Political Economy, 31 (1), pp. 169-205.

Louçã F. (2010), “Bounded heresies, early intuitions of complexity in economics”, History of Economic Ideas, 18 (2), pp. 77-113.

Mandelbrot B. (1972), “Statistical methodology for nonperiodic cycles: from the covariance to R/S analysis”, NBER Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 1 (3), pp. 259-290.

Mandelbrot B. (1987), “Towards a second stage of indeterminism in science”, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 12 (2), pp. 117-127.

Marx K. (1867), Capital. Volume I. London: Penguin (1976).

Marx K. (1894), Capital. Volume III. London: Penguin (1981).

Meier G. (ed.) (1987), Pioneers of development. Second Series, Oxford: Oxford University/World Bank

Meier G., Seers D. (eds) (1984), Pioneers of development, Oxford: Oxford University/World Bank

Melo B.C. (2024), A economia capitalista como sistema complexo: evolução de preços do trigo e emergência de estrutura fractal do mercado, doctoral thesis, Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar-UFMG. Available online.

Mowery D.C., Rosenberg N. (1993), “The U.S. national innovation system”, in Nelson R.R. (ed.) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis (pp. 29-75), New York, Oxford: Oxford University.

MPD – Maddison Project Database (2020), Historical statistics of the World Economy – 1-2008 AD, Groningen Growth and Development Centre. Maddison Project Database. Available online.

Nature Physics Review (2021), “From economics to physics”. Available online.

Nelson R. (ed.) (1993), National innovation systems: a comparative analysis, New York, Oxford: Oxford University.

Nelson R., Winter S. (1982), An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge (Ma) and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Nobel Prize Committee (2021), The Nobel Prize in Physics 2021, NobelPrize.org. Available online.

Nussenzveig H.M. (1999), “Introdução à complexidade”, in Nussenzveig H.M. (ed.), Complexidade & caos (pp. 9-26), Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ/COPEA (2nd edition, 2003).

Perez C. (2002), Technological revolutions and financial capital, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Perez C. (2010), “Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34 (1), pp. 185-202.

Radizicki (2003), “Mr. Hamilton, Mr. Forrester, and the foundations of evolutionary economics”, Journal of Economic Issues, 37 (1), pp. 133-173.

Ribeiro L.C. (2022), “Sistemas complexos, economia e Covid-19”, in Albuquerque E.M., Jayme J.R., Frederico G., Britto G. (eds), Crise, pandemia e alternativas (pp. 165-191), Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar-UFMG.

Ribeiro L.C., Deus L.G., Loureiro P.M., Albuquerque E.M. (2017a), “Profits and fractal properties: notes on Marx, countertendencies and simulation models”, Review of Political Economy, 29 (2), pp. 282-306.

Ribeiro L.C., Deus L.G., Loureiro P.M., Albuquerque E.M. (2017b), “A network model for the complex behavior of the rate of profit: exploring a simulation model with overlapping technological revolutions”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 43, pp. 51-61.

Ribeiro L.C., Deus L.G., Loureiro P.M., Albuquerque E.M. (2018), “Changing levels of self-organization: how a capitalist economy differs from other complex systems”, Cedeplar-UFMG Discussion Papers, n. 581, Belo Horizonte: Cedeplar, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Robert V., Youguel G. (2016), “Complexity paths in neo-schumpeterian evolutionary economics, structural change and development policies”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 38, pp. 3-14.

Rosenberg N. (1972), Technology and American economic growth, Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Rosenberg N. (1998a), “Chemical engineering as a General Purpose Technology”, in Helpman E. General Purpose Technologies and economic growth (pp. 167-192), Cambridge, Mass./London: The MIT Press.

Schmalensee R.L. (1989), “Inter-industry studies of structure and performance”, in Schmalensee R.L. and Willig R.D. (eds), Handbook of industrial organization (v. 2, pp. 951-1009), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

Schumpeter J.A. (1911), A teoria do desenvolvimento econômico. São Paulo: Nova Cultural,1985.

Schumpeter J.A. (1939), Business cycles: a theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the capitalist process, Volume 1. New York/London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

Slutsky E.E. ([1927] 1937), “The Summation of Random Causes as the Source of Cyclic Processes”, Econometrica, 5 (2), pp. 105-146.

Smith A. (1776), A Riqueza das Nações: investigação sobre sua natureza e suas causas, São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1983. Available online.

The Economist (2023), “Which countries have escaped the middle-income trap”, 30 March 2023. Available online.

World Bank (2023), World Development Indicators. Available online.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

da Motta e Albuquerque, E. (2024). Complex systems: Introductory notes on a dialogue among political economy, evolutionary economics and physics. PSL Quarterly Review, 77(310), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18651

Issue

Section

Special issue on structural change, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability: new perspectives and policies in economic development