Society matters: A post-Keynesian approach to economic development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18654Keywords:
methodological individualism, microfoundations, economic development, demand-led growthAbstract
This paper discusses methodological individualism and the perceived “need” for microfoundations in economic theory. It argues that the persistent focus on microfoundations has led a large part of the field to overlook the complexity of social interactions, the relevance of historical processes, and the characteristics of each society in understanding economic growth and development. The paper suggested focusing on social foundations as an alternative to microfoundations that is particularly relevant for studying economic development processes. It proposes framing the post-Keynesian view of demand-led growth and distribution-led growth within a conceptual framework of socio-economic development as a valid approach, consistent with social foundations, to understand a phenomenon as complex and multi-causal as development.
References
Abramovitz M. (1986), “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind”, Journal of Economic History, 46(2), pp. 385-406.
Abramovitz M. (1989), Thinking about Growth: And Other Essays on Economic Growth and Welfare, Cambridge University Press.
Arthur W.B. (2014), Complexity and the Economy, Oxford University Press.
Bengtsson E. and Stockhammer E. (2021), “Wages, Income Distribution and Economic Growth: Long-Run Perspectives in Scandinavia, 1900–2010”, Review of Political Economy, 33(4), pp. 725-745.
Bengtsson E., Rubolino E. and Waldenström D. (2020), “What Determines the Capital Share Over the Long Run of History?”, CESifo Working Paper, no. 8281, May, Munich: Center for Economic Studies and the ifo Institute. Available online.
Bhaduri A. and Marglin S. (1990), “Unemployment and the real wage: The economic basis for contesting political ideologies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), pp. 375-393.
Blecker R.A. (2002), “Distribution, Demand and Growth in Neo-Kaleckian Macro-Models”, in M. Setterfield (ed.), The Economics of Demand-Led Growth Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run (pp. 129-152), Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Blecker R.A. and Setterfield M. (2019), Heterodox macroeconomics: Models of demand, distribution and growth, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Botta A., Porcile G. and Ribeiro R.S.M. (2018), “Economic development, technical change and income distribution: A conversation between Keynesians, Schumpeterians and Structuralists. Introduction to the Special Issue”, PSL Quarterly Review, 71(285), pp. 97-101. Available online.
Brundtland G.H. (2010), “Global Change and Our Common Future”, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 31 (5), pp. 16-43.
Cesaratto S. (2023), “Agency, functionalism, and all that. A Sraffian view”, HAL open science, hal-04168887. Available online.
Colander D. (2000), “The Death of Neoclassical Economics”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2), pp. 127-143.
Davis J.B. (2003), The Theory of the Individual in Economics: Identity and Value, Abingdon: Routledge.
Davis J.B. (2006), “The Nature of Heterodox Economics”, Post-Autistic Economic Review, 40, pp. 23-30.
Davis J.B. (2011), Individuals and Identity in Economics, Cambridge University Press.
Giddens A. (1976), Central Problems in Social Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Giddens A. (1984), The Constitution of Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hayek F.A. von (1942), “Scientism and the Study of Society. Part I”, Economica, 9(35), pp. 267-291.
Hein E. (2017), “Post-Keynesian macroeconomics since the mid-1990s: Main developments”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 14(2), pp. 131-172.
Hein E. and Lavoie M. (2019), “Post-Keynesian economics”, in The Elgar Companion to John Maynard Keynes (pp. 540–546), Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hodgson G.M. (1989), “Post-Keynesianism and institutionalism: The missing link”, in J. Pheby (Ed.), New Directions in Post-Keynesian Economics (pp. 94-123), Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hodgson G.M. (2001), How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science, Abingdon: Routledge.
Hodgson G.M. (2007), “Meanings of methodological individualism”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(2), pp. 211-226.
Hoover K.D. (2023), “The struggle for the soul of macroeconomics”, Journal of Economic Methodology, 30(2), pp. 80-89.
Kaldor N. (1966), Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom: An inaugural lecture, London: Cambridge UP.
Kalecki M. (1971), Selectes essays in the dynamics of the capitalist economy, Cambridge University Press.
Kalecki M. (1996), Teoría de la dinámica económica: Ensayo sobre los movimientos cíclicos y a largo plazo de la economía capitalista, Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Karabarbounis L. and Neiman B. (2014), “The Global Decline of the Labor Share*”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(1), pp. 61-103.
King J. (2012), The Microfoundations Delusion, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Kirman A. (1992). “Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(2), pp. 117-136.
Kirman A. (2010), Complex Economics: Individual and Collective Rationality, Abingdon: Routledge.
Kuznets S. (1966), Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure and Spread, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lakatos I. (1976), “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”, in S.G. Harding (ed.), Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis (pp. 205-259), Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands.
Lavoie M. (2022), Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations, Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lavoie M. and Stockhammer E. (2013), “Wage-led Growth: Concept, Theories and Policies”, in M. Lavoie and E. Stockhammer (Eds.), Wage-led Growth (pp. 13-39), Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Lawson T. (2008), “Heterodox economics and pluralism: Reply to Davis”, In E. Fullbrook (Ed.), Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and his critics (pp. 93–128), Abingdon: Routledge.
Lucas R.E. (1976), “Econometric policy evaluation: A critique”, in Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol. 1, pp. 19-46), North-Holland: Elsevier.
Maddison A. (1988), “Ultimate and proximate growth causality: A critique of Mancur Olson on the rise and decline of nations”, Scandinavian Economic History Review, 36(2), pp. 25-29.
Marmissolle P. (2021), “Régimen de crecimiento de la economía uruguaya. Una aproximación desde el lado de la demanda (1908-2017)”, Serie Documentos de Trabajo, no. 19/21, Montevideo: Instituto de Economía, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administración, Universidad de la República. Available online.
Marx K. (1867), El capital. Crítica de la Economía Política. Tomo I (Vols 1, 2).
Mises L. von (1949), Human Action: A Treatise On Economics, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mott T. (2002), “Longer-run aspects of Kaleckian macroeconomics”, in M. Setterfield (ed.), The Economics of Demand-Led Growth Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run (pp. 153-171), Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing.
Myrdal G. (1968), Asian Drama An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
Nelson A. (1984), “Some Issues Surrounding the Reduction of Macroeconomics to Microeconomics”, Philosophy of Science, 51(4), pp. 573–594.
North D.C. and Thomas R.P. (1973), The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press.
Palley T.I. (2014), “Rethinking wage vs. Profit-led growth theory with implications for policy analysis”, IMK Working Paper, no. 141, Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Institut für Makroökonomie und Konjunkturforschung (IMK. Available online.
Pasinetti L.L. (1983), Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations, Cambridge University Press.
Porcile G., Spinola D, and Yajima G. (2023), “Growth trajectories and political economy in a Structuralist open economy model”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 11(3), pp. 350–376.
Ricardo D. (1817), On the principles of political economy and taxation.
Robbins L. (2007), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Robinson J. (1980), “Time in Economic Theory”, Kyklos, 33(2), pp. 219-229.
Rodrik D. (2003), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, Princeton University Press.
Roncaglia A. (2017), A brief history of economic thought, Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter J. (1909), “On the Concept of Social Value”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23(2), pp. 213-232.
Seers D. (1979), “The Meaning of Development”, in D. Lehmann (ed.), Development Theory: Four Critical Studies (pp. 9-31), London: Frank Cass.
Sen A. (2001) Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press.
Shapiro C. and Stiglitz J.E. (1984), “Equilibrium Unemployment as a Worker Discipline Device”, The American Economic Review, 74(3), pp. 433–444.
Smith A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.
Solow R. (2008), “The State of Macroeconomics”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), pp. 243-246.
Steindl J. (1952), Maturity and Stagnation in the American Economy, London: Blackwell.
Storm S. (2021),” Cordon of Conformity: Why DSGE models Are Not the Future of Macroeconomics”, International Journal of Political Economy, 50(2), pp. 77-98.
Storm S. and Naastepad C.W.M. (2013), “Wage-led or profit-led supply: Wages, productivity and investment, in M. Lavoie (Ed.), Wage-Led Growth: An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery (pp. 100-124), Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Szirmai A. (2012), “Proximate, intermediate and ultimate causality: Theories and experiences of growth and development”, UNU-MERIT Working paper series, no. 2012-032, Maastricht: United Nations University. Available online.
Szirmai A. (2015), Socio-Economic Development, Cambridge University Press.
Verdoorn P.J. (1949), “Fattori the regolano lo sviluppo della produttività del lavoro”, L’ Industria, 1, pp. 3-10.
Vergés-Jaime J. (2023), “Apparent micro-realism in mainstream orthodox economics”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 46(1), pp. 87-112.
Von Neumann J. and Morgenstern O. (1947), Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd rev., Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Pablo Marmissolle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
