The Solow residual, a distributional approach: The case of Chile, 1985-2019

Authors

  • Fernando Villanueva Melo National Statistics Institute of Chile (INE)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18663

Keywords:

Solow residual, total factor productivity, functional income distribution, wages productivity, rate of profit, Chile, growth accounting

Abstract

The primary goal of this paper is to present a distributive proposal for reinterpreting Solow’s residual and apply it within the Chilean context. We argue that Solow’s residual can only indirectly capture technological phenomena. This critique draws upon the contribution of Felipe and McCombie (2020), who contend that production functions merely reflect an identity account. Hence, the so-called Total Factor Productivity (TFP) mirrors the dynamic of real wages and the rate of profit.

We adopt a descriptive approach to estimate and decompose the Solow residual growth for the Chilean economy, to discern the origins of distributional changes between 1985 and 2019. A key patterns is that throughout almost the entire period, the dynamic of the Solow residual is closely intertwined with fluctuations in the profit rate. Additionally, we decompose the profit rate to highlight that the decline in the Chilean economy’s profit rate stems from both distributional and technological factors.

References

Abramovitz M. (1956), “Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870”, in Resource and output trends in the United States since 1870 (pp. 1-23). Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.

Acemoglu D. (2008), Introduction to modern economic growth, Princeton University Press.

Barro R. and Sala-i-Martin X. (2004), Economic growth, second edition, Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

Basu D. and Vasudevan R. (2013), “Technology, distribution and the rate of profit in the US economy: understanding the current crisis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(1), pp. 57-89.

Beyer H. and Vergara R. (2002), “Productivity and economic growth: the case of Chile”, in Loayza N. and Soto R. (eds), Economic Growth: Sources, Trends and Cycles. Santiago (Chile): Central Bank.

Bhaduri A. and Marglin S. (1990), “Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), pp. 375-393.

Brown E.P. (1957), “The meaning of the fitted Cobb-Douglas function”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 71(4), pp. 546-560.

CLAPES UC (2020), Informe Cuarto trimestre de 2019 y anual 2019: Índice de Productividad Clapes UC, Centro Latinoamericano de Políticas Económicas y Sociales (CLAPES).

CNP – Comisión Nacional de Productividad (2016), La productividad en Chile: Una mirada de largo plazo. Informe Anual 2016, Comisión Nacional de Productividad.

CNP – Comisión Nacional de Productividad (2018), Informe anual 2018, Comisión Nacional de Productividad.

CNP – Comisión Nacional de Productividad (2022), Informe anual 2021. Comisión Nacional de Productividad.

De Gregorio J. (1997), “Crecimiento potencial en Chile: una síntesis”, in Morandé F. and Vergara. (eds), Análisis Empírico del Crecimiento en Chile (pp. 39-66), Santiago (Chile): CEP/ILADES.

De Gregorio J. (2004), “Economic growth in Chile: evidence, sources and prospects”, Documentos de Trabajo (Banco Central de Chile), no. 298, Santiago (Chile): Banco Central de Chile.

DIPRES. (2020). Resultados comité PIB tendencial: Acta Comité Consultivo PIB tendencial 2020. https://www.dipres.gob.cl/598/articles-202678_doc_pdf.pdf

Felipe J. and McCombie J. (2020), “The illusions of calculating total factor productivity and testing growth models: from Cobb-Douglas to Solow and Romer”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 43(3), pp. 470-513.

Ffrench-Davis, R. (2005). Reformas para América Latina después del fundamentalismo neoliberal. CEPAL.

Ffrench-Davis R. (2018), Reformas económicas en Chile 1973-2017, Santiago (Chile): Taurus.

Field A.J. (2010), “The Procyclical Behavior of Total Factor Productivity in the United States, 1890-2004”, Journal of Economic History, 70(2), pp. 326–350.

Fuentes R., Larraín M. and Schmidt-Hebbel K. (2006), “Sources of Growth and Behavior of TFP in Chile”, Cuadernos de economía, 43(127), pp. 113-142. Available online.

Gallego F. and Loayza N. (2002), “La época dorada del crecimiento en Chile: explicaciones y proyecciones”, Revista Economía Chilena, 5(1), pp. 37-67.

Henríquez, C. (2008). Stock de capital en Chile (1985-2005): metodología y resultados (No. 63). Central Bank of Chile.

Lavoie M. and Stockhammer E. (2013), “Wage-led growth: Concept, theories and policies”, in Wage-led growth: An equitable strategy for economic recovery (pp. 13-39), London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Matus and Reyes. (2021), “Precios y Salarios en Chile, 1886-2009”, in Llorca-Jaña M. and Miller R. (2021), Historia económica de Chile desde la Independencia (pp. 677-723), Santiago (Chile): RIL Editores.

Minsky H.P. (2013), Ending poverty: Jobs, not welfare, Annandale-on-Hudson (NY): Levy Economics Institute.

Palma J.G. (2019), “The Chilean economy since the return to democracy in 1990. On how to get an emerging economy growing, and then sink slowly into the quicksand of a ‘middle-income trap’”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, no. CWPE1991, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

Pasinetti L.L. (1962), “Rate of profit and income distribution in relation to the rate of economic growth”, The Review of Economic Studies, 29(4), pp. 267-279.

Schmöller M. and Spitzer M. (2020), “Endogenous TFP, business cycle persistence and the productivity slowdown in the euro area”, ECB Working Paper, no. 2401, Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

Shaikh A. (1974), “Laws of production and laws of algebra: the humbug production function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 56 (1), pp. 115-120.

Shaikh A. (2016), Capitalism: Competition, conflict, crises, Oxford University Press.

Simon H.A and Levy F.K. (1963), “A note on the Cobb-Douglas function”, The Review of Economic Studies, 30(2), pp. 93-94.

Solow R.M. (1957), “Technical change and the aggregate production function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), pp. 312-320.

UAI and CORFO (2014), “Evolución de la Productividad Total de Factores (PTF) en Chile”, Boletín, no. 8, Santiago (Chile): Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez/Corporación de Fomento de la producción.

UNSC – United Nations Statistical Commission (2009), System of national Accounts 2008, New York: European Communities, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations and World Bank. Available online.

Vergara R. (2005), “Productividad en Chile: determinantes y desempeño”, Estudios públicos, 99, p. 23-66. Available online.

Weisskopf T.E. (1979), “Marxian crisis theory and the rate of profit in the postwar US economy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3(4), pp. 341-378.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-14

How to Cite

Villanueva Melo, F. (2024). The Solow residual, a distributional approach: The case of Chile, 1985-2019. PSL Quarterly Review, 77(310), 409–436. https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18663

Issue

Section

Special issue on structural change, social inclusion, and environmental sustainability: new perspectives and policies in economic development