Sustainable development: Theory and some simple simulations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18921Keywords:
sustainable development, social inclusion, technological capabilities, center-peripheryAbstract
This paper develops a unified framework to analyze the environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainable development within the context of a center-periphery international system. It introduces a three-gap model to address the challenges posed by the discrepancies among three key growth rates: the maximum growth rate compatible with external equilibrium, the minimum growth rate required for social inclusion, and the maximum growth rate consistent with environmental sustainability. Using updated theoretical and empirical insights, the paper applies the model to Latin American economies, highlighting the structural constraints and opportunities for achieving sustainable development in peripheral regions. By quantifying the interactions between technological capabilities, green investments, and social inclusion policies, the study offers policy recommendations to foster balanced and inclusive growth paths aligned with global sustainability commitments.
References
Araújo R.A. and Lima G.T. (2007), “A Structural Economic Dynamics Approach to Balance-of Payments-Constrained Growth”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(5), pp. 755-774.
Alatorre J.E., Juárez J., Moreno-Brid J.C. and Porcile G. (2024), “Political conflict, green capabilities and growth patterns in a Kaleckian small open economy”, 7th ASTRIL Conference, 25-26 January 2024, Rome. Available online.
Althouse J., Guarini G. and Porcile G. (2020), “Ecological macroeconomics in the open economy: Sustainability, unequal exchange and policy coordination in a center-periphery model”, Ecological Economics, 172, 2 March, art. 106628.
Basilio J., Cimoli M. and Porcile G. (2019), “A Technology Gap Interpretation of Growth Paths in Latin America and Asia”, Research Policy, 48, pp. 125-136.
Bianchi C., Galaso P. and Palomeque S. (2023), “Absorptive capacities and external openness in underdeveloped innovation systems: a patent network analysis for Latin American countries 1970–2017”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 47(6), pp. 1139-1170.
Bielschowsky R. (1998), “Cincuenta años del pensamiento de la CEPAL: una reseña”, in Cincuenta años de pensamiento en la CEPAL: textos seleccionados (LC/G.2699), vol. I, Santiago: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL)/Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Blecker R. (2022), “New Advances and Controversies in the Framework of Balance-of-Payments-Constrained Growth”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 36(2), pp. 429-467.
Blecker R. and Setterfield M. (2019), Heterodox Macroeconomics: Models of Demand, Distribution and Growth. Cheltenham (UK) and Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar.
Botta A., Porcile G., Spinola D. and Yajima G. (2023), “Financial integration, productive development and fiscal policy space in developing countries”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 66(2023), pp. 175-188.
Carnevali E., Godin A., Lucarelli S. and Veronese Passarella M. (2020), “Productivity growth, Smith effects and Ricardo effects in Euro Area's manufacturing industries”, Metroeconomica, 71, pp. 129-155.
Cimoli M. and Porcile G. (2011), “Global growth and international cooperation: A Structuralist perspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35(2), pp. 383-400.
Criscuolo P. and Narula R. (2008), “A Novel Approach to National Technological Accumulation and Absorptive Capacity: Aggregating Cohen and Levinthal”, The European Journal of Development Research, 20(1), pp. 56-73.
Cohen W.M. and Levinthal D.A. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), pp. 128-152.
Dávila-Fernández M.J. and Sordi S. (2020), “Attitudes towards climate policies in a macrodynamic model of the economy”, Ecological Economics, 169, art. 106319.
De Paula L., Fritz B. and Prates D. (2017), “Keynes at the Periphery: Currency Hierarchy and Challenges for Economic Policy in Emerging Economies”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(2), pp. 183-202.
Dosi G., Pavitt K. and Soete L. (1990), The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Dosi G. and Nelson R.R. (1994), “An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics”, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4, pp. 153-172.
Dosi G., Fagiolo G. and Roventini A. (2010), “Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(9), pp. 1748-1767,
Dosi G., Grazzi M. and Moschella D. (2015), “Technology and Costs in International Competitiveness: From Countries and Sectors to Firms”, Research Policy, 44, pp. 1795-1814.
ECLAC – Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2020), Building a New Future: Transformative Recovery with Equality and Sustainability, Santiago: United Nations.
ECLAC – Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2023a), Social Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2023: Labour inclusion as a key axis of inclusive social development (LC/PUB.2023/18-P/Rev.1), Santiago: ECLAC. Available online.
ECLAC – Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (2023b), The economics of climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean, 2023: Financing needs and policy tools for the transition to low-carbon and climate-resilient economies (LC/TS.2023/154), Santiago: ECLAC. Available online.
Evans P. and Heller P. (2015), “Human Development, State Transformation and the Politics of the Developmental State”, in Leibfried S., Nullmeier F., Huber E., Lange M., Levy J. and Stephens J.D. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State (pp. 691-713). Oxford: Oxford University.
Fagerberg J. and Verspagen B. (2002), “Technology gap, Innovation-Diffussion and Transformation: An Evolutionary Interpretation”, Research Policy, 31, pp. 1291-1304.
Fajnzylber F. (1983), La industrialización trunca de América Latina, Ciudad de México: Editorial Nueva Imagen.
Freeman C. (2004), “Technological Infrastructure and International Competitiveness”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), pp. 541-569.
Furtado C. (1974), O mito do desenvolvimento econômico, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra.
Georgescu-Roegen N. (1971), The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Graciarena J. (1976), “Power and development styles”, CEPAL Review, 1976(1), pp. 173-194.
Johansen S. (1988), “Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), pp. 231-254.
Johansen S. and Juselius K. (1990), “Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration—with applications to the demand for money”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), pp. 169-210.
Gatti D. (2022), “Going green and (un)equal? Political coalitions, redistribution, and the environment”, Economic Modelling, 116, art. 105996.
Guarini G. and Oreiro J.L. (2022), “An ecological view of new developmentalism: a proposal of integration”, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 42(1), pp. 244-255. Available online.
Grazini C., Guarini G. and Porcile G. (2024), “Institutional change and ecological structural change”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 71 (Dec), pp. 354-368. Available online.
Hein E. and Truger A. (2012), “Finance-dominated capitalism in crisis—the case for a global Keynesian New Deal”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 35(2), pp. 187-213.
Kaltenbrunner A. and Painceira J.P. (2015), “Developing Countries Changing Nature of Financial Integration and New Forms of External Vulnerability: the Brazilian Experience”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), pp. 1281-1306.
Lall S. (2000), “The Technological Structure and Performance of Developing Country Manufactured Exports, 1985-98”, Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), pp. 337-369.
Lima L., Torres M., Romeiro A. and Bueno C. (2024), “O neoestruturalismo ecológico e as três lacunas do desenvolvimento sustentável”, Revista Economistas, 15(53): pp. 48-53. Available online.
Lundvall B. (2007), “National Innovation Systems—Analytical Concept and Development Tool”, Industry and Innovation, 14(1), pp. 95-119.
Magacho G., Espagne E., Godin A., Mantes A. and Yilmaz D. (2023), “Macroeconomic exposure of developing economies to low-carbon transition”, World Development, 167, art. 106231. Available online.
Magacho G., Godin A., Yilmaz S.D. and Spinola D. (2024), “Recycling carbon taxes for reindustrialization”, AFD Research Papers, no. 311, Paris: Éditions Agence française de développement. Available online.
Marquetti A., Miebach A. and Morrone H. (2024), Unequal Development and Capitalism: Catching Up and Falling Behind in the Global Economy, London: Routledge.
Meadows D., Meadows D., Randers J. and Behrens W. (1972), The Limits to Growth. A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project of the Predicament of Mankind, New York: Universe Book.
Nochteff H. (1996), “The Argentine experience: Development or a succession of bubbles”, CEPAL Review, 1996(59), pp. 111-126. Available online.
Ocampo J.A. (2016), “Balance-of-Payments Dominance: Implications for Macroeconomic Policy”, in Damill M., Rapetti M. and Rozenwurcel G. (eds), Macroeconomics and Development: Roberto Frenkel and the Economies of Latin America (pp. 211-228), New York: Columbia University Press.
Oreiro J. (2020), “New Developmentalism: Beyond Competitive Exchange Rate”, Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 40(2), pp. 238-242.
Pinto A. (1976), “Styles of Development in Latin America”, CEPAL Review, 1976(1), pp. 99-130. Available online.
Palazzo G. (2024), “Real Exchange Rate and Export Surge Episodes: What Sectors Take Advantage of the Real Exchange Rate Stimulus?”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 68, pp. 446-467.
Palazzo G. and Rapetti M. (2017), “Real exchange rate and export performance in Argentina, 2002–2008”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 40(1), pp. 75-94.
Porcile G. (2024), “Sustainable development in a center-periphery model”, LEM Papers Series, 2024/10, Pisa (Italy): Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Laboratory of Economics and Management. Available online.
Porcile G. and Torres M. (2024), “The evolution of the ecological perspective in Latin American Structuralism”, in Schincariol V.E. (ed.), Environment and Ecology in the History of Economic Thought (pp. 181-197), Abingdon (UK): Routledge.
Porcile G., Alatorre J.E., Cherkasky M., Gramkow C. and Romero J. (2023), “New directions in Latin American Structuralism: a three-gap model of sustainable development”, European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 20(2), pp. 266-281. Available online.
Prebisch R. (1950), The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems, Santiago: United Nations/ECLAC. Available online.
Prebisch R. (1963), Hacia una dinámica del desarrollo latinoamericano, Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Prebisch R. (1970), Transformación y desarrollo: la gran tarea de América Latina, Ciudad de México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Rodríguez O. (2006), El estructuralismo latinoamericano, Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI.
Romero J.P. and Gramkow C. (2021), “Economic Complexity and Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, World Development, 139, art. 105317.
Stark A., Gale F. and Murphy-Gregory H. (2023), “Just Transitions’ Meanings: A Systematic Review”, Society & Natural Resources, 36(10), pp. 1277–1297. Available online.
Storm S. and Naastepad C.W.M. (2012), Macroeconomics Beyond the NAIRU, Cambridge (MA) and London: Harvard University Press. Sunkel O. (1980), “The Interaction Between Styles of Development and the Environment in Latin America”, CEPAL Review, 1980(12), pp. 15–49. Available online.
Sunkel O. (1981), La dimensión ambiental en los estilos de desarrollo de América Latina, Santiago de Chile: ECLAC/PNUMA.
Torres M. and Ahumada J.M. (2022), “Las relaciones centro-periferia en el siglo XXI”, El Trimestre Económico, 89(353), pp. 151-195.
Verspagen B. (1993), Uneven Growth between Interdependent Economies: An Evolutionary View of Technology Gaps, Trade and Growth, Aldershot (UK): Avebury, Ashgate.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jose Eduardo Alatorre, Gabriel Porcile, Fernando Sossdorf, Miguel Torres
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
