A note on the Kaleckian government spending multiplier and self-financing fiscal policy

Authors

  • Leonardo Vera Universidad Metropolitana, Caracas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18987

Keywords:

Fiscal policy, government spending multiplier, self-financing, debt-to-GDP ratio, decent work and economic growth

Abstract

This paper formulates a simple short-term Kaleckian model where the impact on output of an active fiscal policy can be assessed and the Kaleckian government spending multiplier introduced. The model also allows us to verify the limits through which an expansion of public spending can be self-financing. As in DeLong and Summers (2012) and Leão (2013), an unbalanced fiscal expansion raises aggregate demand and output through the short-term fiscal multiplier, and higher current output brings with it higher tax collections. Thus, under certain conditions, this mechanism allows for the recapture of some of the costs of the fiscal expansion. Due to the Kaleckian features of the model economy, a change in the functional distribution of income will generate an alteration in the conclusions reached regarding the evolution of the incremental debt-to-GDP ratio and self-financing. This is an important aspect of the distributional effects in Kaleckian models that has received very little or no attention from the theoretical literature.

References

Allain O. (2015), “Tackling the Instability of Growth: A Kaleckian-Harrodian Model with an Autonomous Expenditure Component”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 39(5), pp. 1351-1371.

Asimakopulos A. (1975), “A Kaleckian Theory of Income Distribution”, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 8(3), pp. 313-333.

Assous M. (2011), “Income Distribution and The Trade Cycle in the ‘Years of High Theory’”, Cahiers d’économie Politique /Papers in Political Economy, n. 61, pp. 91-111.

Batini N., Eyraud L., Forni L., Weber A. (2014), “Fiscal Multipliers: Size, Determinants, and Use in Macroeconomic Projections”, IMF Technical Notes and Manuals, no. 2014/004, Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund. Available online.

Bhaduri A., Marglin S. (1990), “Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4), pp. 375-393.

Charles S., Dallery T. and Marie J. (2015), “The Keynesian multiplier in recession: why fiscal stimulus is now even more necessary in the Eurozone?”, CEPN Policy Brief, Centre d’Economie de l’Université de Paris Nord, April(7), pp. 1-4. Available online.

Christiano L., Eichenbaum M. and Rebelo S. (2011), “When Is the Government Spending Multiplier Large?”, Journal of Political Economy, 119(1), pp. 78-121.

DeLong B. and Summers L. (2012), “Fiscal policy in a depressed economy”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 43(1), pp. 233-274.

Domar E. (1944), “The ‘Burden of the Debt’ and the National Income”, The American Economic Review, 34(4), pp. 798-827.

Eggertsson G. (2010), “What Fiscal Policy Is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 25, pp. 59–112.

Gechert S. and Rannenberg A. (2018), “Which Fiscal Multipliers are Regime-Dependent? A Meta-Regression Analysis”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 32(4), pp. 1160-1182.

Harcourt (1965), “A Two-Sector Model of the Distribution of Income and the Level of Employment in the Short Run”, Economic Record, 41(43), pp. 103-117.

Harris D. (1974), “The price policy of firms, the level of employment and the distribution of income”, Australian Economic Papers, 13, pp. 144-151.

Hein E. (2018), “Autonomous government expenditure growth, deficits, debt, and distribution in a neo-Kaleckian growth model”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 41(2), pp. 1-17.

Hlaváček M. and Ismayilov I. (2022), “Meta-analysis: Fiscal Multiplier”, IES Working Papers, no. 2022/07, Prague: Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies. Available online.

Hutton J.P. and Lambert P.J. (1980), “Evaluating Income Tax Revenue Elasticities”, The Economic Journal, 90, pp. 901-906.

Kalecki (1937), “A Theory of Commodity, Income, and Capital Taxation”, The Economic Journal, 47(187), pp. 444-450.

Ko M. (2019), “Fiscal policy, government debt, and economic growth in the Kaleckian model of growth and distribution”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 42(2), p. 215-231.

Langer G. (1985), “Bastard Kalecki: A Pedagogical Polemic”, Roosevelt University, Mimeo.

Leão P. (2013), “The effect of government spending on the debt-to-GDP ratio: some Keynesian arithmetic”, Metroeconomica, 64(3), pp. 448-465.

Mott T. (1989), “The Structure of Class Conflict in a Kaleckian–Keynesian Model”, Working Paper No. 21, The Jerome Levy Economics Institute, Bard College

Musgrave R. (1959), The Theory of Public Finance: A Study in Public Economy, New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

Onaran O. and Galanis G. (2014), “Is Aggregate Demand Wage-led or Profit-led? A Global Model”, in Lavoie M. and Stockhammer E. (eds.), Wage-Led Growth. An Equitable Strategy for Economic Recovery (pp. 71-99), London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Palley T. (2012), “The simple macroeconomics of fiscal austerity: Public debt, deficits and deficit caps”, Intervention, 9(1), pp. 91-107.

Ramey V. (2011), “Can Government Purchases Stimulate the Economy?”, Journal of Economic Literature, 49(3), pp. 673-685.

Reynolds P. (1987), Political Economy: A Synthesis of Kaleckian and Post Keynesian Economics, New York: St. Martin’s Press.

Smith P. (1963), “A Note on the Built-in Flexibility of the Individual Income Tax”, Econometrica, 31(4), pp. 704-711.

Taylor L. (1988), “Fiscal Issues in Macroeconomic Stabilization”, The World Bank Working Paper Series, no. 34, Washington (DC): The World Bank.

Vera L. (2006), “Representative agent meets class structure: Imperfect competition and the balanced-budget multiplier”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, pp. 783-796.

Woodford M. (2011), “Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier”, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 3(1), pp.1-35.

Zezza F. (2024), “Fiscal and monetary policy in an SFC model of the Italian economy”, Levy Economics Institute Working Paper, no. 1063, Annandale-on-Hudson (NY): Levy Economics Institute of Bard College. Available online.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-10

How to Cite

Vera, L. (2026). A note on the Kaleckian government spending multiplier and self-financing fiscal policy. PSL Quarterly Review, 79(316), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/18987

Issue

Section

Articles