Unit of account or medium of exchange?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/9882Keywords:
exchange, moneyAbstract
Article originally published in the volume 60 issue 241 of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review (also known as BNL Quarterly Review).
Money evolved gradually as a cuitural product; it was not orig-inally invented and imposed by the state (although it did Iater come under state domination). Historical evidence does not conclusively settle whether unit of account (numéraire) or medium of exchange evolved earliest. Quite plausibIy, one function carne first in some times and places, the other in others. Little of analytical importance hinges on the answer. Both functions are important in economie life and in monetary theory. Who knows how to measure and compare degrees of importance? IndirectIy or directly, as explained above, both functions have a quantitative aspect. Convenience does recommend a single numéraire within a currency area, but a well organized payments system can readiIy accommodate multiple media of exchange (if, indeed, notes and deposits of different banks and claims on other types of financial institution count as separate media). Much can be said in favor of separation of functions in the sense of a numéraire defined inde-pendently of any partieular medium of exchange.
JEL Codes: E40
References
ALLAIS, M. (1947), Économie et Intéret, two volumes, Imprimerie Nationale, Paris.
ASCHHEIM, J. and G.S. TAVLAS (2006), "Money as numeraire: doctrinal aspects and contemporary relevance", Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, vol. 59, no. 239, pp. 333-71.
EINZIG, P. (1966), Primitive Money, second edition, Pergamon Press, Oxford.
EUCKEN, w. (1950), The Foundations of Economics, Hodge, London; original edition in 1940.
GREENFIELD, R. and L. YEAGER (1983), "A laissez-faire approach to monetary stability", Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 302-15.
HART, H.L.A. (1982), Essays on Bentham, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
HART, H.L.A. (1983). Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
HAYEK, F. (1984), "The future monetary unit of value", in B. Siegel ed., Money in Crisis, Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, San Francisco, and Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 323-35.
HOPPE, H.-H., J.G. HULSMANN and W. BLOCK (1998), "Against fiduciary media", Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, vol. 1, no.1, pp. 19-50.
KIYOTAKI, N. and J. MOORE (2002), "Evil is the root of all money", American Economic Review, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 62-66.
KOCHERLAKOTA, N. (1996), "Money is memory", Federal Reserve Bank of Minnesota Staff Report, no. 218.
KUENNE, R. (1958), "On the existence and role of money in a stationary system", Southern Economic Journal, vol. 25, July, pp. 1-10.
LANE, F. and R. MUELLER (1985), Money and Banking in Medieval and Renaissance Venice, vol. 1: Coins and Moneys of Account, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
MENGER, C. (1909/2002), "Money" in M. Latzer and S.W. Schmitz eds, Cari Menger and the Evolution of Payments Systems, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham and Northampton, pp. 25-108.
MISES, L. VON (1912-1934-1981). The Theory of Money and Credit, Liberty Classics, Indianapolis.
MOINI, M. (2001), "Toward a general theory of credit and money", Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 267-317.
POPPER, K. (1982), Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography, revised edition, Open Court, La Salle.
RADFORD, R. (1945), "The Economic organisation of a P.O.W. camp", Economica, n.s. vol. 12, no. 48, pp. 189-201.
SCHUMPETER, J. (1956), "Money and the social product", International Economic Papers, November, pp. 148-211; original edition in 1917-18.
SCHUMPETER, J. (1970), Das Wesen des Geldes, drafted around 1930, edited from manuscript by F. Mann, Vandenhoeck Et Ruprecht, Gottingen.
SHAH, P. and L. YEAGER (1994), "Schumpeter on monetary determinacy", History of Political Economy, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 443-64.
YEAGER, L. (1968), "Essential properties of the medium of exchange", Kyklos, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 45-68.