Does the stock of money have any causal significance?

Authors

  • Philip Arestis
  • Malcolm Sawyer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/9895

Keywords:

Macroeconomics, Monetary Policy, Monetary, Money, Policy

Abstract

Recent developments in macroeconomics, and economic policy in general, have produced a "new consensus" economy-wide model, in which the stock of money does not play any causal role. The stock of money operates a mere residual in the economic process. The absence of the stock of money in many current debates over monetary policy has prompted the statement by the Governor of the Bank of England (during his time as the Deputy Governor) that it is ironic that as central banks became more and more concerned with price stability, less and less attention is paid to money. Indeed, the decline of interest in money appeared to have coincided with low inflation in a significant number of countries. This has prompted a number of contributions that, wittingly or perhaps unwittingly, have attempted to "reinstate" a more substantial role for money in this "new" macroeconomics. In this paper we wish to argue that these attempts to "reinstate" money in current macroeconomic thinking entails two important problems. The first is that they contradict an important theoretical property of the new "consensus" macroeconomic model, namely that of dichotomy between the monetary and the real sector. The second is that some of these attempts either fail in terms of their objective, or merely reintroduce the problem rather than solving it. We conclude that if money is to be given a causal role in the "new" consensus model, then a great deal of more substantial research would be necessary.

 

JEL Codes: E51, E52, E44

References

ARESTIS, P. (1987-88), "The credit segment of a UK Post Keynesian model", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 250-69.

ARESTIS, P. and I. BIEFANG-FRISANCHO MARISCAL (1995), "The endogenous money stock: empirical observations from the UK", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 545-59.

ARESTIS, P. and P. HOWELLS (1996), "Theoretical reflections on endogenous money: the problem with 'convenience lending'", Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 539-51.

ARESTIS, P. and M.C. SAWYER (2002a), "The Bank of England macroeconomic model: its nature and implications", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 529-545.

ARESTIS, P. and M.C. SAWYER (2002b), "Can monetary policy affect the real economy?", Working Paper, no. 355, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, September.

ARESTIS, P. and M. SAWYER (2003), "The nature and role of monetary policy when money is endogenous", Working Paper, no. 374, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College, March.

BERNANKE, B.S. and M. GERTLER (1989), "Agency costs, net worth, and business fluctuations", American Economic Review, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 14-31.

BERNANKE, B.S. and M. GERTLER (1999), "Monetary policy and asset price volatility", New Challenges for Monetary Policy, Proceedings of the Symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 26-28, pp. 77-128.

BERNANKE, B.S., M. GERTLER and S. GILCHRIST (1996), "The financial accelerator and the flight to quality", Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 1-15.

BERNANKE, B.S., M. GERTLER and S. GILCHRIST (1998), "The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework", NBER Working Paper Series, no. 6455.

BERNANKE, B.S., M. GERTLER and S. GILCHRIST (1999), "The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework", J. Taylor and M. Woodford eds, The Handbook of Macroeconomics, volume 1, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 1341-93.

BERNANKE, B.S., M. GERTLER and M. WATSON (1997), "Systematic monetary policy and the effects of oil price shocks", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 1, pp. 91-142.

BRUNNER, K. and A.H. MELTZER (1993), Money and the Economy: Issues in Monetary Analysis, Cambridge University Press for the Raffaele Mattioli Foundation, Cambridge.

CALVO, G. (1983), "Staggered prices in a utility maximising framework", Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 383-98.

CLARBDA, R., J. GALS and M. GERTLER (1999), "The science of monetary policy: a new Keynesian perspective", Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1661-707.

COTTRELL, A. (1994), "Post-Keynesian monetary economics", Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 587-606.

HENDRY, S. (1995), "Long-run demand for Ml", Bank of Canada Working Paper, no. 95-11.

HOWELLS, P. (1995), "Endogenous money", International Papers in Political Economy, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-41.

HOWELLS, P. (2001), "Endogenous money", P. Arestis and M. Sawyer eds, Money, Finance and Capitalist Development, Edward Elgar Aldershot, pp. 134-78.

IRELAND, P.N. (2001), "Money's role in the monetary business cycle", National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, no. 8115, February.

KING, M. (2002), "No money, no inflation - The role of money in the economy", Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Summer, pp. 162-77.

KYDLAND, F.E. and E.C. PRESCOTT (1977), "Rules rather than discretion: the inconsistency of optimal plans", Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 473-92.

LAIDLER, D. (1999), "The quantity of money and monetary policy", Bank of Canada Working Paper, no. 99-5.

LAVOIE, M. (1992), Foundations of Post-Keynesian Economic Analysis, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

LEAHY, J.V. (2001), "Commentary", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 161-63.

MCCALLUM, B.T. (2001), "Monetary policy analysis in models without money", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 145-60.

MEYER, L.H. (2001), "Does money matter?", Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1-15.

MOORE, B.J. (1988), Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

ROM.ER, D. (2000), "Keynesian macroeconomics without the LM curve", Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 149-69.

SPAHN, P. (2001), "On the theory of interest rate policy", Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, vol. LIV, no. 219, pp. 355-80.

VOLCKER, P. (2002), "Monetary policy transmission: past and future challenges", Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7-11.

Downloads

Published

2012-04-19

How to Cite

Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2012). Does the stock of money have any causal significance?. PSL Quarterly Review, 56(225). https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/9895

Issue

Section

Articles