https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/issue/feedPSL Quarterly Review2026-01-17T16:26:28+00:00PSL Quarterly Reviewpslqr@uniroma1.itOpen Journal Systems<p><strong>PSL Quarterly Review</strong> is an open access forum for pluralist debate on economics and economic policy at the international level. We welcome contributions in all fields and from all the schools and research paradigms of economics without discrimination, provided they are rigorous in method and relevant in content. For more information see <a href="https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/about">About</a>.</p>https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/19117Garegnani and the surplus approach2025-10-12T15:35:31+00:00Alessandro Roncagliaalessandro.roncaglia@uniroma1.it<p>The article reviews Garegnani’s 2024 book (<em>Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand: An Alternative Framework for the Analysis of Value, Distribution and Output Levels</em>, Springer), collecting his most important essays, carefully edited by Roberto Ciccone. Pierangelo Garegnani (1930-2011) was one of the main exponents of the surplus approach. The review article recalls his important contributions to the critique of the marginalist theory of value and distribution, and provides a critical overview of his contributions to the construction of a Classical-Sraffian approach based on the notions of a ‘core’ of economic theory and of ‘long-period positions’, suggesting the possibility of an alternative Sraffian-Keynesian construction.</p>2026-01-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Alessandro Roncagliahttps://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/19244The nature of central banking2026-01-17T14:28:57+00:00Wesley C. Marshallwesm@xanum.uam.mxLouis-Philippe Rochonlprochon@laurentian.caGregorio Vidalgvidal@izt.uam.mx<p>In this article we argue that we can more easily understand the duality of central banks (CBs) and independent central banks (ICBs) through an understanding of their underlying dualities. As we explore, heterodox and orthodox views and methodologies present two distinct ways of conceptualizing all that is involved in economic activity, and correspond to a social interpretation and a market interpretation of economics. This clear dividing line can be traced between visions of individuals, society, money and banking, and indeed central banking and independent central banking. As we will show, CBs and ICBs have well recognized – but poorly classified – distinctions that allow for a clear separation between their natures. Once revealed as quite distinct institutions, the public policy decision of maintaining independent central banks more fully aligns with the disastrous history of such institutions on the well being of national economies.</p>2026-01-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Wesley C. Marshall, Louis-Philippe Rochon, Gregorio Vidalhttps://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/19067The lead-lag relationships between profits, investment and output: The evidence from Germany2025-08-25T23:04:11+00:00Ivan Trofimovivan.trofimov1@gmail.com<p>This study considers the short-term lead-lag relationships between profits, private investment, and output. The interplay between the variables is examined using quarterly data for Germany during the 1991Q2–2020Q3 period. The methodology comprises: examination of the cross-correlations; the estimation of linear regression models with finite and polynomial distributed lags, as well as vector autoregressions; and the time-varying and frequency domain Granger causality tests to account for instabilities in the series and to distinguish causality at different time horizons. The findings provide strong support for the “profit as a driver of investment” and “investment as a driver of output” hypotheses, and ambiguous support for the opposite hypothesis (“investment that leads profit”). This paper is one of the few to examine profit-investment-output relationships in a setting other than the United States and to employ complementary and nondescriptive methods to obtain more robust findings.</p>2026-01-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Ivan Trofimovhttps://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/18744Bitcoin Halvings and Institutional Investors: A Wavelet Analysis2025-01-17T14:43:01+00:00Tatiana Silveira Camacho tatianacamachoecon@gmail.comGuilherme Jonas da Silvaguilhermejonas@ufu.br<p>As a highly speculative asset, bitcoin’s (BTC) demand is particularly based on the perceptions of agents about the financial asset. Especially institutions that began leaving a bigger footprint in the market, causing changes in transaction flow and price cycles. To assess how halving dynamics changed the BTC market, Wavelet methodology was carried out with daily data (from January 2011 to December 2021), on price and transaction count. Decomposition in scale and frequency indicate that flows were altered by the arrival of new investors, and stronger correlations between prices and transactions were found at lower frequencies (longer time horizon).</p>2026-01-17T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2026 Tatiana Silveira Camacho , Guilherme Jonas da Silva