Sulla non neutralità a breve termine della moneta nella teoria quantitativa.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651/12575Keywords:
Quantity theory, non-neutrality of money, Fisher, Chicago School, Ritter, Friedman, CambridgeAbstract
Recent years have seen a renewed interest in the traditional pre-Keynesian quantity theory. This paper is concerned with the contention that - in the formal development of this theory in the past - a change in the quantity of money expends itself solely in influencing the price level, but not the volume of output even in the short run. This contention about the nature of the theory seems to be common both to its critics and to at least one of its modern-day adherents. The author examines the writings of Irving Fisher, the Chicago school, the Cambridge economists, and other quantity theorists to determine the validity of the interpretations put forth by Lawrence Ritter and Milton Friedman.
JEL: E31, E40, E51
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
All material in this website and every article published by the review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non commercial - No derivates 4.0 International license. Authors retain all rights on their works and grant the right to first publication to the review under the aforementioned license.
