Spettri del mitico “ordo”: diritto e mercato nel neoliberalismo (Ghosts of mytical ‘ordo’: Law and markets in neoliberalism)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651_72.288_2Keywords:
Neoliberalism, Ordoliberalism, law and the marketAbstract
Il tema dei rapporti tra l’ordoliberalismo tedesco e il neoliberalismo americano, già affrontato da Foucault, sembra essere particolarmente attuale. Alcuni si chiedono se le teorie ordoliberali potrebbero offrire un’alternativa allo sviluppo del sistema neoliberale degli ultimi decenni, avvenuto sotto la prevalente influenza del pensiero americano. L’autore analizza quelli che considera i tratti essenziali del neoliberalismo, con riferimento al tema dei rapporti tra diritto e mercato, e conclude nel senso che, nonostante qualche apparenza in senso contrario, l’ordoliberalismo e il neoliberalismo americano condividono alcune rilevanti concezioni di fondo, il che induce ad escludere che il pensiero ordoliberale possa offrire oggi rilevanti spunti in direzioni diverse da quelle che il sistema neoliberale ha percorso e sta percorrendoThe relationship between German Ordoliberalism and American Neoliberalism, first analyzed by Foucalt, is of special interest today. Commentators ask if Ordoliberal theories could offer an alternative to the neoliberal developments of the last few decades, shaped by American thought. The article anayzes the main traits of Neoliberalism on the issue of the relation between law and the market. The author concludes that despite appearances to the contrary, Ordoliberalism shares several relevant background assumptions with Neoliberalism, which leads to think that Ordoliberalism cannot offer a relevant alternative to the developments that neoliberalism recently went through.
JEL codes: B25, K10, A12
References
Alchian A. e Demsetz H. (1972), “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization”, The American Economic Review, 62 (5), pp. 777-795.
Allen F. e Carletti E. (2013), “New Theories to Underpin Financial Reform”, Journal of Financial Stability, 9 (2), pp. 242-249.
Atkinson A.B. (2015), Inequality: What Can Be Done?, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Bain J. S. (1954), “Economies of scale, concentration, and the condition of entry in twenty manufacturing industries”, The American Economic Review, 44 (1), pp. 15-39.
Berle A., Means G. (1932), The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Macmillan: New York.
Bickenbachand F. e Soltwedel R. (1994), “Das Ethische Fundament der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft”, Kiel Working Paper, n. 612, Kiel: Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
Biebricher T. (2013), “Europe and the Political Philosophy of Neoliberalism”, Contemporary Political Theory, 12 (4), pp. 338-375.
Biebricher T. (2014), “The return of ordoliberalism in Europe: notes on a research agenda”, i-lex, 21, pp. 1-24.
Böhm F. ([1953] 1960), “Der Rechtsstaat und der soziale Wohlfahrtsstat”, in Reden und Schriften (pp. 82-156), Karlsruhe: C.F. Muller.
Böhm F. ([1957] 1960), “Die verantwortliche Gesellscahft”, in Reden und Schriften (pp. 3-22), Karlsruhe: C.F. Muller.
Böhm F. (1987), “Rule of Law in the Market Economy”, in Peacock A. e Willgerodt H. (a cura di), Germany's Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution (pp. 46-67), Londra: Macmillan.
Böhm F., Eucken W. e Rossmann-Dörth H. ([1936] 2016), Il nostro compito. Il Manifesto dell’Ordoliberalismo, in Forte F. e Felice F. (a cura di), Il liberalismo delle regole. Genesi ed eredità dell’economia sociale di mercato (pp. 47-60), 2a ed., Soveria Mannelli (CZ): Rubbettino.
Bonefeld W. (2017), The Strong State and the Free Economy, Londra e New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Brozen Y. (1970), “The Antitrust Task Force Deconcentration Recommendation”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 13 (2), pp. 279-292.
Cerny P. (2016), “In the Shadow of Ordoliberalism: The Paradox of Neoliberalism in the 21st Century”, European Review of International Studies, 3 (1), pp. 78-92.
Coleman J. (1982), “The Normative Basis of the Economic Analysis of Law”, Faculty Scholarship Series, n. 4200, New Haven (CT): Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship, disponibile alla URL: https://digitalcommons.law .yale.edu/fss_papers/4200.
Dale G. e El-Enany N. (2013), “The Limits of Social Europe: EU law and the Ordoliberal Agenda”, German Law Journal, 14 (5), pp. 613-649.
Dean M. (2018), “Foucault and the Neoliberalism Controversy”, in Cahill D., Cooper M., Konings M. e Primrose D. (a cura di), The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 40-53), Londra: SAGE Publications.
Denozza F. (2002), Norme efficienti. L’analisi economica delle regole giuridiche, Milano: Giuffrè.
Denozza F. (2012), “Mercato, razionalità degli agenti e disciplina dei contratti”, Osservatorio del diritto civile e commerciale, 1, pp. 5-40.
Denozza F. (2013), “Fallimenti del mercato: i limiti della giustizia mercantile e la vuota nozione di ‘parte debole’”, Orizzonti del diritto commerciale, 3, pp. 1-17.
Denozza F. (2014), “La frammentazione del soggetto nel pensiero giuridico tardo‐liberale”, in Rivista del diritto commerciale, 112 (1), 13-48.
Denozza F. (2015), “Quale quadro per lo sviluppo della corporate governance?”, Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale, 2015 (1), pp. 1-14.
Denozza F. (2016), “In viaggio verso un mondo re-incantato? Il crepuscolo della razionalità formale nel diritto neoliberale”, in Osservatorio del diritto civile e commerciale, 2016 (2), pp. 419-446.
Denozza F. (2017a), “Regole e mercato nel diritto neoliberale”, in Rispoli Farina M., Sciarrone Alibrandi A. e Tonelli E., Regole e mercato (vol. 2, pp. xv-xlv), Torino: Giappichelli Editore.
Denozza F. (2017b), “The Future of Antitrust: Concern for the Real Interests at Stake or Etiquette for Oligopolists?”, Orizzonti del diritto commerciale, 1, pp. 1-24.
Denozza F. (2017c), “The Contractual Theory of the Firm and Some Good Reasons for Regulating the Employment Relationship”, in Perulli A. e Treu T. (a cura di), Enterprise and Social Rights (cap. 2), Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
Denozza F. (2018), “L’‘efficienza’ dell’aggiudicazione tra razionalità formale ed elasticità evolutiva, ovvero Max Weber contro l’economic analysis of law”, in Ammannati L., Corrias P., Sartori F. e Sciarrone Alibrandi A. (a cura di), I giudici e l’economia (pp. 17-38), Torino: Giappichelli
Denozza F. (2019a), “Lo stile giuridico neoliberale”, in Sacchi R. e Toffoletto A. (a cura di), Esiste uno “stile giuridico” neoliberale? Atti dei seminari per Francesco Denozza (pp. 1-39). Milano: Giuffrè.
Denozza F. (2019b), “Conclusioni: lo stile giuridico neoliberale e il suo superamento”, in Sacchi R. e Toffoletto A. (a cura di), Esiste uno “stile giuridico” neoliberale? Atti dei seminari per Francesco Denozza (pp. 411-439), Milano: Giuffrè.
Dullien S. e Guérot U. (2012), “The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany’s Approach to the Euro Crisis”, ECFR Policy Brief, n. ECFR/49, Londra: European Council of Foreign Relations, disponibile alla URL: https://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR49_GERMANY_BRIEF.pdf.
Eucken W. (1951), I fondamenti dell’economia politica: Sansoni, Firenze.
Eucken W. ([1952] 2004), Grundsätze der Wirtschaftpolitik, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Fama E. e Jensen M. (1983), “Agency Problems and Residual Claims”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 26 (2), pp. 327-349.
Feld L., Köhler E. e Nientiedt D. (2018), “The German Anti-Keynes? On Walter Eucken’s Macroeconomics”, Freiburger Diskussionspapiere zur Ordnungsökonomik, n. 18/11, Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg.
Forte F. e Felice F. (a cura di) (2016), Il liberalismo delle regole. Genesi ed eredità dell’economia sociale di mercato, 2a ed., Soveria Mannelli (CZ): Rubbettino.
Foucault M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. Lectures at the Collège de France 1978-79, Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.
Friedrich C. (1955), “The Political Thought of Neo-Liberalism”, American Political Science Review, 49 (2), pp. 509-525.
Hahnel R. (2007), “The Case Against Markets”, Journal of Economic Issues, 41 (4), pp. 1139-1159.
Hausman D. (1992), “When Jack and Jill Make a Deal”, Social Philosophy & Policy, 9 (1), pp. 95-113.
Hecker C. (2011), “Soziale Marktwirtschaft und Soziale Gerechtigkeit: Mythos, Anspruch und Wirklichkeit”, Zeitschrift Ifür Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik, 12 (2), pp. 269-294.
Hien J. (2013), “The Ordoliberalism That Never Was”, Contemporary Political Theory, 12 (4), pp. 349-358.
Hien J. e Joerges C. (2017), “Ordoliberalism As an Irritating German Idea”, Arena Report, n. 1/2017, Oslo: Arena Center for European Studies, University of Oslo, disponibile alla URL: https://www.academia.edu /31423064/_ORDOLIBERALISM_AS_AN_IRRITATING_GERMAN_IDEA_ARENA_REPORT_1_2017.
Hien J. e Joerges C. (2018), “Dead Man Walking? Current European Interest in the Ordoliberal Tradition”, EUI Department of Law Research, n. 2018/3, Firenze: European University Institute, disponibile alla URL: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/51226/LAW_2018_03.pdf?sequence=1.
Hilgers M. (2012), “The Historicity of the Neoliberal State”, Social Anthropology, 20 (1), pp. 80-94.
Kennedy, D. (2006), “Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850-2000”, in Trubek D. e Santos A. (a cura di), The New Law and Economic Development. A Critical Appraisal (pp. 19-73). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Klump R. e Wörsdörfer M. (2009), “Über die normativen Implikationen des Ordoliberalismus für die moderne Wirtschaftsethik”, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Unternehmensethik, 10 (3), pp. 322-340.
Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (2017), Soziale Marktwirtschaft: Vordenker und Klassiker, Berlino: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
Marx K. ([1867] 2006), Il capitale, Libro I, Roma: Editori Riuniti.
Mason E.S. (1949), “The current status of the monopoly problem in the United States”, Harvard Law Review, 62 (8), pp. 1265-1285
Mason E.S. (1956), “Market Power and Business Conduct: Some Comments”, The American Economic Review, 46 (2), pp. 471-481.
Mierzejewski A. (2005), Ludwig Erhard: A Biography, Chapel Hill (NC) e Londra: University of North Carolina Press.
Mishan E.J. (1971), “The Postwar Literature on Externalities: An Interpretative Essay”, Journal of Economic Literature, 9 (1), pp. 1-28.
Oliver H. (1960), “German Neoliberalism”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74 (1), pp. 117-149.
Olsaretti S. (2004), Liberty, Desert and the Market: A Philosophical Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peacock A. e Willgerodt H. (a cura di) (1987), Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution, Londra: Macmillan.
Peck J. (2010), Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Picciotto S. (2010), “International Transformations of the Capitalist State”, Antipode, 43 (1), pp. 87-107.
Picciotto S. (2011), Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Piketty T. (2013), Le capital au XXIe siècle, Parigi: Seuil.
Polanyi ([1944] 1957), The Great Transformation: Economic and Political Origins of Our Time, Boston: Beacon Press.
Posner R. (1995), Overcoming Law, Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Rittershausen J. (2007), “The Postwar West German Economic Transition: From Ordoliberalism to Keynesianism”, IWP Discussion Paper, n. 2007/1, Colonia: Institut für Wirtschaftspolitik (IWP).
Rodger B. (2000), “Competition Policy, Liberalism and Globalization: A European Perspective”, Columbia Journal of European Law, 6, pp. 289-319.
Röpke W. ([1958] 2016), “Presupposti e limiti del mercato”, in Forte F. e Felice F. (a cura di), Il liberalismo delle regole. Genesi ed eredità dell’economia sociale di mercato (pp. 141-191), 2a ed., Soveria Mannelli (CZ): Rubbettino.
Schlecht O. (1990), Grundlagen und Perspektiven der sozialen Marktwirtschaft, Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Stiglitz J. (2012), The Price of Inequality, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Toffoletti L. (2019), “La vicenda dell’esenzione antitrust-Una rilettura dell’art. 102.3 del Trattato come baluardo di resistenza allo stile neo-liberale”, in Sacchi R. e Toffoletto A. (a cura di), Esiste uno “stile giuridico” neoliberale? Atti dei seminari per Francesco Denozza (pp. 269-288). Milano: Giuffrè.
Vogel S.K. (1996), Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries, Itacha e Londra: Cornell University Press.
Watrin C. (1989), “Towards a More Humane Society”, in Peacock A. e Willgerodt H. (a cura di), Germany’s Social Market Economy: Origins and Evolution (pp. 106-123), Londra: Palgrave Macmillan.
White J. (2017), “Between Rules and Discretion: Thoughts on Ordoliberalism”, Europe in Question Discussion Papers Series, n. 126/2017, Londra: London School of Economics, disponibile alla URL: http://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/Assets/Documents/LEQS-Discussion-Papers/LEQSPaper126.pdf.
Williamson O. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies, NewYork: FreePress.
Wolff E. (2014), “Household Wealth Trends in the United States, 1962-2013: What Happened over the Great Recession?”, NBER Working Paper, n. 20733, dicembre, Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research.
Wörsdörfer M. (2011a), Die normativen und wirtschaftsethischen Grundlagen des Ordoliberalismus, Inaugural-Dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Francoforte sul Meno.
Wörsdörfer M. (2011b), “Die anthropologischen Grundlagen der sozialen Marktwirtschaft und der Sozialpartnerschaft –unter besonderer Berücksichtigung neuerer Forschungsergebnisse”, disponibile alla URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2390582.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All material in this website and every article published by the review are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Non commercial - No derivates 4.0 International license. Authors retain all rights on their works and grant the right to first publication to the review under the aforementioned license.
