Prezzi relativi e deflazione delle tabelle input-output: implicazioni per l’analisi strutturale

Autori

  • Patieene Alves Passoni Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651/17867

Parole chiave:

input-output tables, deflation, relative prices, Brazil, Mexico

Abstract

L’obiettivo principale di questo studio è comparare coefficienti tecnici calcolati a prezzi correnti e a prezzi deflazionati secondo tre differenti metodologie (deflatore singolo, deflatori settoriali e deflatori specifici), allo scopo di identificare l’impatto che queste strategie di calcolo alternative possono avere per l’analisi del cambio strutturale. Il confronto è effettuato per il Brasile e il Messico, sulla base delle World Input-Output Tables (WIOT) riferite agli anni tra il 2000 e il 2014. L’ipotesi centrale è che, a seconda del metodo di deflazione utilizzato, i settori che presentano una variazione significativa dei prezzi relativi possono subire una variazione dei coefficienti tecnici senza che ciò sia dovuto ad una variazione nelle quantità di input. La conclusione più importante è che i risultati osservati per le due economie non sono indifferenti al metodo di deflazione utilizzato, con implicazioni per l'analisi dei cambiamenti strutturali.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Aroche Reyes F. (2021), “On growth regimes, structural change and input coefficients”, Economic Systems Research, 33 (1), pp. 114-131.

Aslam A., Beidas-Strom S., Bems M.R., Celasun O., Çelik S.K. e Koczan Z. (2016), Trading on Their Terms? Commodity Exporters in the Aftermath of the Commodity Boom, Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.

Balassa B. (1961), “Patterns of industrial growth: comment”, American Economic Review, 51 (3), pp. 394-397.

Balk B.M. e Reich U.P. (2008), “Additivity of national accounts reconsidered”, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 33 (2-3), pp. 165-178.

Bellino E. (2015), “Sraffa’s price equations in light of Garegnani and Pasinetti”, Cahiers d’economie Politique, (2), pp. 15-44.

Casler S.D. (2006), “Discrete growth, real output, and inflation: An additive perspective on the index number problem”, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 31 (1-2), pp. 69-88.

Chenery H.B. (1960), “Patterns of industrial growth”, American Economic Review, 50 (4), pp. 624-654.

Chenery H.B. e Watanabe T. (1958), “International comparisons of the structure of production”, Econometrica, 26 (4), pp. 487-521.

Dietzenbacher E. e Hoen A.R. (1998), “Deflation of input‐output tables from the user’s point of view: A heuristic approach”, Review of Income and Wealth, 44 (1), pp. 111-122.

Diewert E. (2013), “Irving Fisher and index number theory”, Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 35 (2), pp. 199-232.

Diewert W.E. (1998), “Index number issues in the consumer price index”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12 (1), pp. 47-58.

Diewert W.E. (2015), “Decompositions of productivity growth into sectoral effects”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 43 (3), pp. 367-387.

Dumagan J.C. (2008), “Avoiding anomalies of GDP in constant prices by conversion to chained prices: Accentuating shifts in Philippine economic transformation”, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, n. 2008-24, Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS).

Dumagan J.C. (2011), “Implementing weights for additivity of chained volume measures in the national accounts”, PIDS Discussion Paper Series, n. 2011-09, Makati City: Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS).

Erten B. e Ocampo J.A. (2013), “Super cycles of commodity prices since the mid-nineteenth century”, World development, 44, pp. 14-30.

Felipe J., Mehta A. e Rhee C. (2019), “Manufacturing matters… but it’s the jobs that count”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43 (1), pp. 139-168.

Freitas F.N. e Dweck E. (2013), “The pattern of economic growth of the Brazilian economy 1970–2005: a demand-led growth perspective”, in Levrero E.S., Palumbo A. e Stirati A. (a cura di), Sraffa and the Reconstruction of Economic Theory: Volume Two (pp. 158-191), London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Garegnani P. (1984), “Value and distribution in the classical economists and Marx”, Oxford Economic Papers, 36 (2), pp. 291-325.

Garegnani P. (1990), “On some supposed obstacles to the tendency of market prices towards natural prices”, Political Economy: Studies in the Surplus Approach, 6 (1-2), pp. 329–59; edizione rivista in Caravale G. (a cura di) (1997), Equilibrium and Economic Theory (pp. 139-170), London: Routledge.

Haraguchi N., Cheng C.F.C. e Smeets E. (2017), “The importance of manufacturing in economic development: has this changed?”, World Development, 93, pp. 293-315.

Hillinger C. (2002), “Consistent aggregation and chaining of price and quantity measures”, Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 28 (1-2), pp. 1-20.

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2016), “Matriz de insumo-produto: Brasil: 2010”, Séries Relatórios Metodológicos, v. 24, Rio de Janeiro: Coordenação de Contas Nacionais/IBGE.

INEGI – Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2018), Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales de México : fuentes y metodologías : año base 2013, México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.

Leontief W. (1985), “The choice of technology”, Scientific American, 252 (6), pp. 37-45.

Los B., Gouma R., Timmer M. e Ijtsma P. (2014), “Note on the construction of WIOTs in previous years prices”, Technical Report, WIOD.

Miller R. e Blair P.D. (2009), Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Neves J.P. (2013), “Mudança estrutural na economia brasileira entre os anos 2000-2008: uma análise de decomposição estrutural”, Tesi di Laurea Magistrale, Istituto di Economia. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Pasinetti L. (1974), Growth and Income Distribution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pasinetti L. (1981), Structural Change and Economic Growth – A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of Wealth of Nations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Passoni P.A. (2019), “Deindustrialization and regressive specialization in the Brazilian economy between 2000 and 2014: a critical assessment based on the input-output analysis”, Tesi di Dottorato, Istituto di Economia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Reich U.P. (2008), “Additivity of deflated input–output tables in national accounts”, Economic Systems Research, 20 (4), pp. 415-428.

Rowthorn R. e Wells J. (1987), Deindustrialization and Foreign Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rowthorn R. e Coutts K. (2004), “De-industrialisation and the balance of payments in advanced economies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28 (5), pp. 767-790.

Rowthorn R. e Ramaswamy R. (1997), Deindustrialization: Causes and Implications (Vol. 10). Washington (DC): International Monetary Fund.

Silva J.C.A. L, Prado l. C. D. e Torracca J.F. (2016), “Um novo olhar sobre um antigo debate: a tese de Prebisch-Singer é, ainda, válida?”, Economia Aplicada/Brazilian Journal of Applied Economics, 20 (2), pp. 203-226.

Sraffa P. (1960), Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (Vol. 1), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tregenna F. (2015), “Deindustrialisation: an issue for both developed and developing countries”, in Weiss J. e Tribe M. (a cura di), Routledge Handbook of Industry and Development (pp. 111-129), London: Routledge.

UNIDO, United Nations Industrial Development Organization (2017), Industrial Development Report 2018: Demand for Manufacturing: Driving Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development, Vienna: United Nations.

UN – United Nations (1993), System of National Accounts 1993 [SNA-93]. New York: UN, 1993.

UN – United Nations (2009), System of National Accounts 2008 [SNA-2008]. New York: UN, 2009.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2022-10-21

Fascicolo

Sezione

Numero speciale: Garegnani, dieci anni dopo