La funzione di produttività di Sylos Labini tra mercato e territorio: un'analisi econometrica per le regioni italiane

Autori

  • Giulio Guarini

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651/10381

Parole chiave:

funzione produttiva, Sylos Labini, regioni italiane

Abstract

This study analyzes the labour productivity for the Italian regions estimating the Sylos Labini's function. In this function, in dynamic term, the labour productivity depends positively on market (Smith effect), on unit labour cost (organization's effect), on difference between wages and prices of machine (Ricardo effect) and past investments, while it depends negatively on current investments (disturbance effect). According to the estimates, for the Italian regions, these three effects are significant; moreover the dimension of these effects are conditioned by sector and territorial peculiarities. In particular, the Smith effect could be determined by the phenomenon of labour hoarding for which during recession entrepreneur prefers to reduce utilization of workers that fire them. Finally, the significance of investments could be caused by an important multicollinearity between present and past investments.

 

 

JEL Codes: O14, R11

 

Riferimenti bibliografici

BAIRAM E. (1991), "Economic growth and Kaldor's law: the case of Turkey, 1925-1978", Applied Economics, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1277-80.

CREPON B., E. DUGUET e J. MAIRESSE C (1998), "Research, innovation, and productivity: an econometric analysis at the firm level", Economics 01 Innovation and New Technology, vol. 7, no, 2, pp. 115-56.

DESTEFANIS S. (2003), "The Verdoorn law: some evidence from non-parametric frontier analysis", in J. McCombie, M. Pugno and B. Sora eds, Productivity Growth and Economic Growth: Essays on Verdoorn 's Law, Palgrave, Houndmills, pp. 136-64.

DIXON R.J. e A.P. THIRLWALL (1975), "A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines", Oxford Economic Papers, vol. 27, no, 2, pp. 201-14.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003), Third European Report on ScieI1ce and Technology, Indicators, Bruxelles,

FORSUND F. (1996), "Productivity of Norwegian establishments: a Malmquist index approach", in D.G, Mayes ed., Sources 01 Productivity Growth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 315-30,

GUARINI G., V. MOLINI e R. RABELLOTI (2006), "Is Korea catching up? An analysis of the labour productivity growth in South Korea", Oxford Development Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 323-39.

GUARINI, G. (2007), "Circoli cumulativi di crescita e progresso tecnico", tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche.

ISTAT (2005), Conti Economici Regionali, Roma

LEON-LEDESMA, M.A (1999), "Verdoorn's law and increasing returns: an empirical analysis of the Spanish regions", Applied Economics Letters, val. 6, no, 6, pp. 373-76.

LEON-LEDESMA, M,A. (2000), "Economic growth and Verdoorn's law in the Spanish regions, 1962-91", International Rel1iew of Applied Eeonomics, vol. 14, no, 1, pp, 55-69.

MCCOMBIE, J.S.L. (1981), "What still remains of Kaldor's laws?", Economic Journal, vol.. 91, no, 361, pp. 206-16.

McCOMBIE, J.S.L. e J,R. DE RIDDER (1983), "Increasing returns, productivity, and output growth: the case of the United States", Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 373-88.

McCOMBIE, J.S.L. e J.R, DE RIDDER (1984), "The Verdoorn's law controversy: some new empirical evidence using US states data", Oxford Economic Papers, val. 36 no. 2, pp. 268-84.

PALAZZI P. e P. PIACENTINI (1980), Domanda di lavoro e produttività nell'industria italiana, il Mulino, Bologna,

PARIKH A. (1978), "Differences in growth rates and Kaldor's laws", Economica, voL 45, no. 177, pp. 83-91.

PUGNO M. (1995), "On competing theories of economic growth, cross-country evidence", International Review of Applied Economics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 249-74.

RICARDO D. (1817), The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

RICARDO D. (1819), The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

RICARDO D. (1976), Principi di economia politica e della tassazione, Isedi, Milano.

ROSENBERG N. (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

ROWTHORN R.E. (1975), "What remains of Kaldor's Law?", Economic Journal, vol.. 85, no. 337, pp. 10-19.

SMITH A. (1776), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.

SMITH A. (1995), La ricchezza delle nazioni, Newton, Roma.

THIRLWALL AP. e DIXON R. (1975), "A model of regional growth-rate differences on Kaldorian lines", Oxford Economics Papers, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 201-14.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1984), Le forze dello sviluppo e del declino, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1992), Elementi di dinamica economica, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1995), "Why the interpretation of the Cobb Douglas production function must be radical1y changed?", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 485-504.

SYLOS LABINI P. (2004), Torniamo ai classici. Produttività del lavoro, progresso tecnico e sviluppo economico, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2013-06-19

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli