Economic sanctions and US international business interests

Authors

  • Hossein Askari
  • John Forrer
  • Hildy Teegen
  • Jiawen Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/9904

Keywords:

International Business, Joint Venture, Policy, Trade

Abstract

Economic sanctions are seen as a foreign policy instrument less severe than military engagement but more potent than diplomacy. The assessment of the economic impact of sanctions invariably focuses on direct bilateral trade, with little regard to indirect costs. In the case of sanctions on Iran, the real cost to Iran and the U.S. is not so much due to reduced trade but to factors such as missed investment and joint venture opportunities, especially in the energy sector. The significant size of these costs for Iran will make it difficult for Iran to resume business as usual with U.S. companies when sanctions are lifted; and for U.S. energy companies, their long-term competitiveness in Iran and also globally will be reduced.

 

JEL Codes: F23, F13

References

BP AMOCO (2000), Statistical Review of World Energy, London.

HAASS, R.H. and M.L. O'SULLIVAN (2000), Economic Sanctions and American Diplomacy, Brookings Institution Press, Washington.

HELMS, J. (1999), "What sanctions epidemic", Foreign Affairs, Jan./Feb., vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 2-8.

HUFBAUER, G.C., J.C. SCHOTT and K.A. ELLIOTT (1990), Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: History and Current Policy, 2nd ed., Institute for International Economics, Washington.

HUFBAUER, G.C., K.A. ELLIOTT, T. CYRUS and E. WINSTON (1997), US Economic Sanctions: Their Impact on Trade, Jobs, and Wages, Institute for International Economics, Washington.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (1978), Iran – Recent economic developments, Washington.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (1995), Islamic Republic of Iran – Recent economic developments, Washington.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (1998), United Arab Emirates – Recent economic developments, Washington.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (1999), Islamic Republic of Iran – Recent economic developments, Washington.

INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (2000), Islamic Republic of Iran – Recent economic developments, Washington.

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS (1997), A Catalog of New US Unilateral Economic Sanctions for Foreign Policy Purposes, 1993-1996, Washington.

PAPE, R.A. (1998), "Why economic sanctions still do not work", International Security, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 66-77.

PETROLEUM ECONOMIST (2000), vol. 67, Euromoney Institutional Investor, Plc., London.

PREEG, E.H. (1999), "Iran: national security at bay", in Feeling Good or Doing Good with Sanctions, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, pp. 47-87.

RENNACK, D.E. and R.D. SHUEY (1997), Economic Sanctions to Achieve US Foreign Policy Goals Discussion and Guide to Current Law, October, CRS Report for Congress, Washington.

STEVENS, P. (2000), "Pipelines or pipe dreams? Lessons from the history of Arab transit pipelines", Middle East Journal, vol. 54, pp. 224-41.

UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT (2000), World Investment Report 2000, Geneva.

USA ENGAGE (2001), Information on website.

WORLD BANK (2000), World Development Indicators 2000, Washington.

Downloads

Published

2012-04-19

How to Cite

Askari, H., Forrer, J., Teegen, H., & Yang, J. (2012). Economic sanctions and US international business interests. PSL Quarterly Review, 55(220). https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3643/9904

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>