Il mutevole carattere del cosi detto ciclo economico

Autori

  • P. SYLOS LABINI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2037-3651/10956

Parole chiave:

Business cycle, development process

Abstract

The common assumption of most of the theoretical models of the business cycle is that this phenomenon has remained basically unchanged over time, the only exception being the great depression, which is regarded as an important yet particular episode. The author sets out to prove that this assumption is incorrect and that a distinction must be made between at least three periods. The first period, from 1800 to 1913, is characterised by conventional business cycles. The second period, between the two world wars, is marked more by violent and irregular fluctuations than any true cycles themselves. And finally, the third period, which begins with the end of World War II, is marked by economic cycles of a new type. The main argument is that the characteristics of the business cycle can not be defined in the abstract, since they are closely connected with the development process and with the industries that drive this process in each historical period. Although generalisations may be proposed, they must be done on the condition that our theoretical analysis prepare the way for empirical analysis, and that these analyses in turn are used to modify the same theoretical models.

 

JEL Codes: E32

 

Riferimenti bibliografici

FRISCH R. (1933), "Propagation Problems and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economics", in Economic Essays in Honour of Gustav Cassel, London, Macmillan.

HICKS J.R. (1932, 1963), The Theory of Wages, London, Macmillan (trad. it. La teoria dei salari, Nuova collana di economisti, vol. XI, Torino, UTET, 1936).

KALECKI M. (1935), "A Macroeconomic Theory of Business Cycles", Econometrica, July.

KEYNES J.M. (1930), A Treatise on Money, London, Macmillan.

KEYNES J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London, Macmillan.

LUCAS R.E. (1985), Studies in Business-Cycle Theory, Cambridge Mass., The MIT Press.

MODIGLIANI F. (1949), "Fluctuations in the Saving Income Ratio. A Problem of Economic Forecasting", in Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. XI, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research.

PARNERN L.L. (1960, 1977), Sviluppo economico e distribuzione del reddito, Bologna, Il Mulino (ed. orig. inglese 1974; ed. orig. del cap. IV: 1960).

PASINETTI L.L. (1981, 1984), Dinamica strutturale e sviluppo economico - Un'indagine teorica sui mutamenti della ricchezza delle nazioni, Torino, UTET (ed. orig. inglese 1981).

SALVATI M. (1990), "Mutamento economico, modelli di società, sviluppo economico", nel volume Europa a confronto. Innovazione, tecnologia, società, a cura di Antonio Ruberti, Roma-Bari, Laterza-Seat.

SRAFFA P. (1960), Produzione di merci a mezzo di merci, Torino, Einaudi.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1956, 1975), Oligopolio e progresso tecnico, Torino, Einaudi.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1967), "Prezzi, distribuzione e investimenti in Italia dal 1951 al 1966: uno schema interpretativo", in questa Rivista, n. 78.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1972, 1977), Sindacati, inflazione e produttività, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1979), Lezioni di economia, vol. I, Roma, Ateneo.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1984), Le forze dello sviluppo e del declino, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1989), Nuove tecnologie e disoccupazione, Roma-Bari, Laterza.

SYLOS LABINI P. (1991), "Mutamenti di lungo periodo nei meccanismi che regolano salari e prezzi e il processo di sviluppo", Rivista di storia economica, n. 3.

TOBIN J. (1990), Price Flexibility and Full Employment. The Debate Then and Now, Napoli, Istituto per gli studi filosofici.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2013-10-24

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articoli

Puoi leggere altri articoli dello stesso autore/i

1 2 > >>