Submissions

Original Article

Original articles are original and scientifically sound experiments providing new empirical evidence. Authors are expected to accurately and consistently motivate their research hypotheses by considering up-to-date empirical evidence present in the literature or considering the relevant theories. The Materials and Methods sections should ensure the reproducibility of the presented work. The analysis strategy should allow the reader to clearly understand which and how each result support or not the advanced hypotheses.

All original articles should include an Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions (optional) sections and must not generally exceed 30,000 keystrokes, spaces included.

Please refer to the Authors' guide for specific instructions and templates.

Research Note

Research Notes are brief reports of short, observational studies that report preliminary results or a short complete study or research that extends previously published research or preliminary results of a new experimental paradigm. Brief reports usually contain two figures and/or a table; however, the Materials and Methods sections should be detailed to ensure the reproducibility of the presented work.

The structure is similar to that of an article, and the limit for research notes is 15,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Annotated/Systematic bibliographies

The journals is interested in publishing annotated bibliography, systematic review, and systematic quantitative meta-analysis focusing on main topics in psychology.

Annotated bibliographies are a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature within a field of study, identifying conflicting results, understudied topics, or problems. We expect Annotated bibliographies to be critical and constructive and provide recommendations for future research. No new, unpublished data should be presented. The structure can include an Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Relevant Sections, Discussion, Conclusions, and Future Directions, with a suggested 25,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Systematic qualitative review articles present a detailed investigation of previous research on a given topic that uses clearly defined search parameters and methods to identify, categorize, analyze, and report aggregated evidence on a specific topic. The structure of systematic reviews should include a Methods section. Preferably Systematic reviews should follow the PRISMA checklist and include a completed PRISMA flow diagram as part of the main text or Supplementary Materials. Authors are encouraged to register their review protocols before data extraction in public registries like PROSPERO. The suggested length of the manuscript is 25,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Systematic quantitative meta-analysis articles, like systematic reviews, combine pertinent study data from several independent and systematically selected studies to develop a single conclusion to reach greater statistical power. The structure of systematic quantitative meta-analysis includes Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions. Systematic quantitative meta-analysis adheres to the PRISMA checklist, and preferably, Authors are invited to register their review protocols before data extraction in public registries like PROSPERO. The suggested length of the manuscript is 25,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Study Protocols

Study protocols in Psychology-Hub should adhere to research standards that promote transparency, reduce publication bias, and enhance the reproducibility of study design and analysis. To this end, study protocols must be theoretically and empirically grounded. 

We encourage the submission of evidence-based psychological interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress and common mental health conditions, as well as promoting sustainable practices and behaviors with both brief and long-term effects. 

The study protocol must provide a detailed account of the hypothesis, rationale, and methodology of the study, including a clear description of the intervention program and the changes expected to be observed in the primary outcomes, the anticipated timeframe for observing these changes, and the ethical requirements. 

Please note that reviewers will be invited to evaluate and report on the study's adequacy in testing the hypothesis, whether the intervention program is sufficiently detailed to allow for replication or comparison, and whether statistical analyses are appropriate given the research hypotheses and the expected results.

Study protocols without ethics approval may not be considered for publication.

Protocols of randomized controlled trials, such as clinical trials, should follow the SPIRIT guidelines and checklist, and the trial registration number must be included in the abstract. With the exclusion of clinical trials, authors must provide a clear justification for all randomized controlled trials for which a registration number is not provided. 

Study protocols have to be submitted well in advance of participant recruitment completion, and authors are invited to confirm the study status within the cover letter.

The final decision on whether to consider a study protocol for publication will rest with the Editor, and appeals will not be considered.

All study protocols should include an Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, the Method describing the Participants with inclusion and exclusion criteria, Procedure with a thorough and reproducible description of the intervention protocol, a complete list of Measures, the Statistical analysis to obtain results to compare with those derived from research hypotheses, Discussion, and Practical Conclusions (optional) sections, and must not generally exceed 30,000 keystrokes, spaces included.

Opinion Paper

The Opinion Paper category provides a platform for authors to contribute individual perspectives on contemporary issues, debated theories, or emerging trends within the field of psychology. Unlike original research articles, these manuscripts focus on logical argumentation, critical synthesis, and the advancement of provocative ideas.

Main Aim and Scope
The primary objective of an Opinion Paper is to challenge existing paradigms, propose new conceptual frameworks, or offer a critique of current practices in psychological research and application.
It should not merely summarize existing literature but must provide a novel, well-reasoned interpretation that stimulates further academic debate. Authors are encouraged to be bold yet grounded in established psychological principles.

Potential Topics

Manuscripts may cover a broad range of subjects, including but not limited to:
- Theoretical Critiques: Evaluation of the limitations of dominant psychological theories (e.g., The Big Five, Cognitive Behavioral models).
- Methodological Debates: Discussions on the replication crisis, the use of p-values, or the ethics of AI in behavioral data collection.
- Clinical Practice: Opinions on the efficacy of specific therapeutic interventions or diagnostic classifications (e.g., DSM-5-TR or ICD-11).
- Social, Developmental, Environmental & Applied Psychology: Perspectives on how psychology addresses modern societal shifts, such as digital connectivity, climate anxiety, or political polarization.
- Interdisciplinary Links: Exploring the intersection of psychology with neuroscience, education, anthropology, philosophy, psychiatry, or sociology.

Manuscript Structure

To ensure clarity and academic rigor, Opinion Papers must adhere to the following structural requirements: 

- Title: Must be concise, engaging, and clearly reflect the "Opinion" nature of the work.

- Abstract: Maximum 250 words; must state the central thesis and the significance of the argument.

- Introduction: Defines the problem or concept and establishes why a new perspective is timely.

- Argumentation: The core of the paper, divided into logical subheadings. Must use evidence to support the stance.

- Conclusion: Summarizes the implications of the opinion for future research or practice.

Technical Requirements

- Word Count: Manuscripts must be no longer than 5,000 words, excluding references, tables, and figure captions.
- References: While the paper is opinion-based, it must be supported by a robust list of scholarly citations (typically 30–60 references).
- Tone: The writing should be professional, scholarly, and persuasive.

Peer Response & Dialogue Provision

A unique feature of the Opinion Paper category is the Right of Reply.
Requirement: Upon the acceptance of an Opinion Paper that presents a significant challenge to a specific school of thought or a foundational theory, the Editorial Board reserves the right to invite a top-tier author or leading expert in that specific sub-field to submit a formal Response Piece.
- If a response is commissioned, it will be published in the same issue as the original Opinion Paper to foster an immediate scientific dialogue.
- The original author may, at the Editor’s discretion, be given a brief "Rebuttal" opportunity to close the exchange.
- A maximum of 4 replies will be accepted. If the number of replies exceeds the requested limit, an Editorial decision will be taken.

Submission Ethics

Authors must disclose any personal or financial conflicts of interest that could be perceived as biasing their "Opinion." All submissions undergo a double-blind peer-review process to ensure that the argument, while subjective, meets the standards of logical consistency and academic merit.

Monothematic issue on "The human and scientific legacy of ALBERT BANDURA"

On the occasion of the Congress on "The human and scientific legacy of ALBERT BANDURA at his centenary. The power of beliefs, the courage to change." held in Rome, 2025 November 27–28, at Sapienza University of Rome, Psychology Hub opens the possibility for convenors to submit their contribution for publication in the Monothematic issue that will be published in December 2026. 

Guest Editors: Concetta Pastorelli, Giovanni Maria Vecchio, Elena Cattelino, and Fiorenzo Laghi

Deadline for submission: June 30th 2026.

Before submit the manuscript, authors are encouraged to consult the Authors' Guidelines 

During submission, please explicitly specify in the cover letter to the editor that you are applying for the Monothematic issue "Bandura's legacy" and select one of the Guest Editor selected for the issue.

Special Issue celebrating the centenary of Eraldo De Grada’s birth: Original Article

Original articles are original and scientifically sound experiments providing new empirical evidence. Authors are expected to accurately and consistently motivate their research hypotheses by considering up-to-date empirical evidence present in the literature or considering the relevant theories. The Materials and Methods sections should ensure the reproducibility of the work. The analysis strategy should allow the reader to clearly understand which and how each result support or not the advanced hypotheses.

All original articles should include an Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions (optional) sections and must not generally exceed 30,000 keystrokes, spaces included.

Please refer to the Authors' guide for specific instructions and templates.

Before submitting your article, please read carefully the Call for Papers celebrating the centenary of Eraldo De Grada’s birth.

Special Issue celebrating the centenary of Eraldo De Grada’s birth: Research Note

Research Notes are brief reports of short, observational studies that report preliminary results or a short complete study or research that extends previously published research or preliminary results of a new experimental paradigm. Brief reports usually contain two figures and/or a table; however, the Materials and Methods sections should be detailed to ensure the reproducibility of the presented work.

The structure is similar to that of an article, and the limit for research notes is 15,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Before submitting your article, please read carefully the celebrating the centenary of Eraldo De Grada’s birth.

Special Issue celebrating the centenary of Eraldo De Grada’s birth: Annotated Bibliographies

The journals is interested in publishing annotated bibliography, systematic review, and systematic quantitative meta-analysis focusing on main topics in psychology.

Annotated bibliographies are a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature within a field of study, identifying conflicting results, understudied topics, or problems. We expect Annotated bibliographies to be critical and constructive and provide recommendations for future research. No new, unpublished data should be presented. The structure can include an Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Relevant Sections, Discussion, Conclusions, and Future Directions, with a suggested 25,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Systematic qualitative review articles present a detailed investigation of previous research on a given topic that uses clearly defined search parameters and methods to identify, categorize, analyze, and report aggregated evidence on a specific topic. The structure of systematic reviews should include a Methods section. Preferably Systematic reviews should follow the PRISMA checklist and include a completed PRISMA flow diagram as part of the main text or Supplementary Materials. Authors are encouraged to register their review protocols before data extraction in public registries like PROSPERO. The suggested length of the manuscript is 25,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Systematic quantitative meta-analysis articles, like systematic reviews, combine pertinent study data from several independent and systematically selected studies to develop a single conclusion to reach greater statistical power. The structure of systematic quantitative meta-analysis includes Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusions. Systematic quantitative meta-analysis adheres to the PRISMA checklist, and preferably, Authors are invited to register their review protocols before data extraction in public registries like PROSPERO. The suggested length of the manuscript is 25,000 keystrokes, including spaces.

Before submitting your article, please read carefully the celebrating the centenary of Eraldo De Grada’s birth.