About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Areas of interest
Psychology Hub publishes original scientific articles in all fields of psychology, with preference for empirical research and qualified theoretical contributions. “Annotated bibliographies” (that is, short reviews) and “research notes” (that is, short articles on circumscribed studies, replication studies, development of tools) are also published. One or more issues every year may be monographic.
Articles should be in English.
“Psychology Hub” only accepts contributions that respect the ethical standards set forth in COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors which can be consulted at http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.
Proposal for publication
The contributions proposed must not have been published before or be simultaneously submitted to other journals. Empirical studies must be accompanied by a letter in which the authors declare that the study has been carried out in compliance with the ethical standards set forth for their field of research and with regulations concerning privacy.
Articles that the Editorial Board considers to be in line with the scope of the journal will be submitted in anonymous form to review by at least two specialists in the field, belonging to different institutions to those in which the authors work. Research notes and annotated bibliographies will be reviewed by a single referee. The reasoned opinion of the reviewers (whether they approve publication or not) will be sent to the authors (in anonymous form). The authors can provide a list of names (not fewer than three, from different institutions) from which the Editorial Board can, at its discretion, may choose one of the reviewers
Any corrections to articles requested by the reviewers must be made within one month, the deadline set for the authors to send the journal the modified version of the article.
The articles, complete with bibliographic references, any artwork and illustrations (graphs, tables, drawings) and footnotes must not generally exceed 30,000 keystrokes, spaces included. For annotated bibliographies and research notes, complete as described above, the limit is 20,000 keystrokes, spaces included.
The articles must be accompanied by a brief summary (around 1,500 keystrokes, spaces included) and by keywords. The abstract must be written bearing in mind the APA (American Psychological Association) standards. To ensure the anonymity of the assessment, the names of the authors (full name and surname), the name of the institutions they work for and the complete address of the reference author for correspondence must not appear on the title page but on a separate file (author file).
The Word files (.doc or .docx) containing the proposed contributions must be sent as attachments by email to the Editorial Office of Psychology hub at email@example.com. Authors are advised to keep a copy of the files sent because the Publisher will not be liable for loss of or damage to the original files sent to the Journal.
Citations of words or short passages (a few lines), even if in a language other than that of the body of the text are indicated in plain text between chevrons. Longer cited passages (more than 5 lines) are indicated in smaller sized font compared to that of the text. Moreover, double quotation marks (“ ”) must be used: (a) for the titles of newspapers, journals, series and periodicals in general of any type; (b) inside citations, for words that generally require the use of chevrons; (c) for words used in a metaphorical sense
Numbers must be written in numerals (e.g. “22 March 1963” or “the device in 1.70m long”). Depending on the context and on common sense, it will be preferable to write: “He waited for one year”, “He has a twelve year old cousin”. In English, use a comma to separate groups of thousands. When several pages are indicated, write the number of the first in full and, for the following ones, only the numbers that change (e.g. pp. 15-6, 130-8, 1359-60, 1199-2002).
Round brackets are always used except: (a) in the progressive numbering of equations, formulas: e.g. [1.1] E = mc2; (b) within a citation to indicate the words of a person other than the author of the same citation; (c) to indicate the omission of a passage, in which case an ellipsis must be provided within the square brackets [...].
All the footnotes will be in plain text, two font sizes smaller than that of the body of the text. In the body of the text, footnote references are followed, and not preceded, by punctuation marks; the exception is the exclamation or question mark that, instead, precedes the footnote reference number.
The so-called American system is used in bibliographic references in the body of the text; that is: the author’s surname (without the given name) and date of publication (separated by a comma). An indication of the page number (preceded by a comma) is used if a citation is given. If there are more than three authors, the abbreviation et al. is used after the first surname. Instead, in the reference list, the authors are all indicated with surname and initial of the given name with period. If more than one work with the same date is indicated for the same author, the year will be indicated (in the body of the text and in the reference list) with a letter in plain text (a b c etc.) based on the alphabetic order of the titles.
At the end of the text the bibliographic references are listed in alphabetical order in accordance with the APA standards (sixth edition); in practice, depending on the nature of the works indicated, follow the examples listed
Articles in journals
Grano, C., Lucidi, F., Crisci, B., & Violani, C. (2013). Validazione italiana della Revised Scale for Caregiving Self- Efficacy: un contributo preliminare basato su un campione di caregiver di familiari con Alzheimer. Rassegna di Psicologia, 30(3), 9-30.
Articles of journals in the process of publication
Cannoni, E., Di Norcia, A., Federico, F. (in press). The bicycle drawing test: mechanical reasoning and/or visual-spatial abilities. Rassegna di Psicologia.
Cannoni, E. (2003). Il disegno dei bambini. Rome: Carocci.
Italian version of a foreign book:
Miller, P.H. (2011). Teorie dello sviluppo psicologico. Quinta edizione. Bologna: il Mulino. (Original edition published in 2011).
«Edited by» books
Damon, W., Lerner, R. M., & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Child Psychology, Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (Vol. 3). Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
Papers and Conferences/Conventions:
Baiocco, R., Ioverno, S., & Laghi, F. (October 2013). Suicidal ideation in gay and lesbian young adults: the role of internalized sexual stigma. Paper presented at: 6th Conference on Emerging Adulthood, Chigaco, USA.
Contributions in a collection or anthology
Harter, S. (2006). The Self. In Damon, W., Lerner, R. M., & Eisenberg, N. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Child Psychology, Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (Vol. 3) (pp. 505-571). Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
The DOI must be indicated at the end of the reference of each article, using the doi format: (i.e. without http://)
The ISSN must be indicated at the end of the reference of each book.
Authors will correct draft copies, making the corrections directly in the pdf file that will be sent by the publisher. The draft copies to correct will be sent to the lead author, requesting that they return it as soon as possible and that they keep modifications to a minimum (in general, the only acceptable changes are the correction of misprints). Drafts that are not returned within 5 days following receipt will be considered null and void and the article will be published as technically corrected by the editorial office.
Excerpts are available in a pdf file. This file will be sent to the authors that request it from the Publisher.
Commitments linked to publication
Acceptance of an article implies that the authors undertake not to publish the work or parts of same elsewhere either in the present or in the future without the written permission of the Publisher. The Publisher will consult the Management of “Psychology hub” and the authors before proposing the reprint of articles in other publications.
Peer Review Process
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Manuscripts are double-blind peer reviewed. Papers will only be sent to review if the Editor determines that the paper meets the appropriate quality and relevance requirements.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Psychology Hub (first published in 2020, vol 37, issue 1) is a new scientific journal that inherits the tradition established by its predecessor Rassegna di Psicologia (last issue 2020, vol. 37, issue 1).
Established in 1984, Rassegna di Psicologia (RdP) has been keeping psychologists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 30 years. The RdP provides a forum for psychology, psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers. Rassegna di Psicologia is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal publishing original research in applied areas of psychology, including: Behavioral Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Psychology, Counseling Psychology, Developmental Psychology, Educational Psychology, Environmental Psychology, Family Psychology, Health Psychology, Measurement/Assessment, Psychodynamics, Psychotherapy, School Psychology, Social Psychology, Sport Psychology, Work, Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Contributions are encouraged from all fields of psychology, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches. RdP focuses on original empirical contributions, but is open to theoretical articles, critical reviews, and replications of published research.
Psychology Hub is property of Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” and is published, both online and printed, three times a year.