How to research something that doesn’t exist?

Reflections on the methodologies adopted in the literature on the spatialities of degrowth

Autori

  • Karl Krähmer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18632

Parole chiave:

decrescita, studi urbani, metodologia

Abstract

In the context of the debate on socio-ecological transformation, over the last years beyond growth perspectives have emerged with strength. In this contribution, I focus in particular on the fast evolving literature at the intersection of degrowth and studies of human geography and spatial planning. I do not propose a review of the contents but rather focus on the methodological challenges of a field that researches something that does not (yet) exist: the spatialities of a degrowth transformation. I identify four main approaches used in the existing literature: case studies of what goes wrong and of good practices, utopian imaginaries and the development of pathways, policies and strategies for change and suggest ways to develop other methodologies.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Akbulut, B. (2019). «The ‘state’ of degrowth: Economic growth and the making of state hegemony in Turkey». Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3): 513-527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619835135.

Anson, A. (2018). «Framing degrowth: The radical potential of tiny house mobility». In: Nelson A. and Schneider F., Eds., Housing for Degrowth. Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities, London: Routledge, 68-79.

Bohnenberger, K. (2021). «Can ‘Sufficiency’ reconcile social and environmental goals? A Q-methodological analysis of German housing policy». Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36: 171-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09762-4

Brokow-Loga, A., Felger, F., Koch, J., and Weber, A.-M. (2020). «Raus aus der Blase⁈ Postwachstumsansätze in Weimar zwischen Selbstbehauptung und Strategien des Wandels». In: Brokow-Loga A. and Eckardt F., Eds., Postwachstumsstadt. Konturen einer solidarischen Stadtpolitik. Munchen: oekom verlag, 238-255.

Brokow-Loga, A., and Krähmer, K. (2024). «The Case for Solidary Degrowth Spaces. Five propositions on the challenging project of Spatializing Degrowth». In: Heron K. and Eastwood L., Eds., De Gruyter Handbook of Degrowth: Propositions and Prospects. Berlin: De Gruyter. (forthcoming)

Cattaneo, C., and Gavalda, M. (2010). «The experience of rurban squats in Collserola, Barcelona: What kind of degrowth?». Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6): 581-589.

Cattaneo, C., Kallis, G., Demaria, F., Zografos, C., Sekulova, F., D’Alisa, G., Varvarousis, A., and Conde, M. (2022). «A degrowth approach to urban mobility options: Just, desirable and practical options». Local Environment, 27(4): 459-486. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2025769

Chertkovskaya, E., Paulson, A., and Barca, S., Eds., (2019). Towards a Political Economy of Degrowth. Lanham: Rowman&Littlefield International.

Cristiano, S., Zucaro, A., Liu, G., Ulgiati, S., & Gonella, F. (2020). «On the Systemic Features of Urban Systems. A Look at Material Flows and Cultural Dimensions to Address Post Growth Resilience and Sustainability». Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 2: 1-10.

Cucca, R., and Friesenecker, M. (2021). «Potential and limitations of innovative housing solutions in planning for degrowth: The case of Vienna». Local Environment, 27(4): 502-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1872513

Dale, J., Marwege, R., and Humburg, A. (2018). «Low impact living: More than a house». In: Nelson A. and Schneider F., Eds., Housing for Degrowth. Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities. London: Routledge, 145-155.

D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., and Kallis, G., Eds., (2015). Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203796146

Demaria, F., Schneider, F., Sekulova, F., and Martinez-Alier, J. (2013). «What is Degrowth? From an Activist Slogan to a Social Movement». Environmental Values, 22(2): 191-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13581561725194

Fitzpatrick, N., Parrique, T., and Cosme, I. (2022). «Exploring degrowth policy proposals: A systematic mapping with thematic synthesis». Journal of Cleaner Production, 365 (132764). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132764

Flyvbjerg, B., Landman, T., and Schram, S. (2012). Real social science: Applied phronesis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gerber, J.-F. (2020). «Degrowth and critical agrarian studies». The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(2): 235-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1695601

Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M., and Whatmore, S. (2011). The dictionary of human geography. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Heikkurinen, P. (2019). «Degrowth: A metamorphosis in being». Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3): 528-547.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618822511

Hickel, J., and Kallis, G. (2020). «Is green growth possible?». New political economy, 25(4): 469-486.

Jarvis, H. (2019). «Sharing, togetherness and intentional degrowth». Progress in Human Geography, 43(2): 256-275.

Kaika, M., Varvarousis, A., Demaria, F., and March, H. (2023). «Urbanizing degrowth: Five steps towards a Radical Spatial Degrowth Agenda for planning in the face of climate emergency». Urban Studies, 60(7): 1191-1211.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231162234

Kallis, G., and March, H. (2015). «Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth». Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(2): 360-368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.973803

Kallis, G., Varvarousis, A., and Petridis, P. (2022). «Southern thought, islandness and real-existing degrowth in the Mediterranean». World Development, 157 (105957). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105957

Koskimäki, T. (2023). «Scientific Consensus on Post-Growth over Green Growth». Medium. https://medium.com/@teemu.koskimaki/scientific-consensus-on-post-growth-over-green-growth-196d3a4f74ff (Last access December 2023).

Kothari, A., Demaria, F., and Acosta, A. (2014). «Buen Vivir, Degrowth and Ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the Green Economy». Development, 57(3-4): 362-375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2015.24

Kothari, A., Salleh, A., Escobar, A., Demaria, F., and Acosta, A., Eds., (2019). Pluriverse. A Post-Development Dictionary. New Delhi: Tulika Books.

Krähmer, K. (2018). «Geography matters: Ideas for a degrowth spatial planning paradigm – On Xue and Vansintjan II». In: Nelson A. and Schneider F., Eds., Housing for Degrowth. Principles, Models, Challenges and Opportunities. London: Routledge, 217-222.

Krähmer, K. (2020). «Are green cities sustainable? A degrowth critique of sustainable urban development in Copenhagen». European Planning Studies, 0(0): 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1841119

Krähmer, K. (2022). «Degrowth and the city: Multiscalar strategies for the socio-ecological transformation of space and place». City, 26(2-3): 316-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2022.2035969

Krähmer, K. (2023). «Degrowth at a Global Scale? Geographies of Chile’s Fruit Industry between Extractivism and Socio-Ecological Transformation». PhD Thesis, Phd Program Urban and Regional Development, XXXV cycle, Politecnico di Torino.

Krähmer, K., and Cristiano, S. (2022). Città oltre la crescita. Un dibattito internazionale per trasformazioni urbane sociali ed ecologiche. Rome: Castelvecchi.

Lamker, C. W. and Schulze Dieckhoff, V. (2019). Sechs Thesen einer Postwachstumsplanung. Dortmund: Kollektiv Postwachstumsplanung.

Lietaert, M. (2010). «Cohousing’s relevance to degrowth theories». Journal of cleaner production, 18(6): 576-580.

Micciarelli, G. (2022). «Hacking the Legal: The commons between the governance paradigm and inspirations drawn from the “living history” of collective land use». In: Savini, F., Ferreira, A., and von Schönfeld K.C., Eds., Post-Growth Planning. Cities beyond the Market Economy. London: Routledge, 112-125.

Mocca, E. (2020). «The local dimension in the degrowth literature. A critical discussion». Journal of Political Ideologies, 25(1): 78-93.

Monbiot, G. (2021). «Private Sufficiency, Public Luxury». ISEE, ESEE & Degrowth International Conference, Manchester (recorded talk). Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWRRPed4Ds0 (Last access December 2023)

Mössner, S., and Miller, B. (2015). «Sustainability in one place? Dilemmas of sustainability governance in the Freiburg metropolitan region». Regions Magazine, 300(1), 18-20.

Nirmal, P., and Rocheleau, D. (2019). «Decolonizing degrowth in the post-development convergence: Questions, experiences, and proposals from two Indigenous territories». Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3): 465-492.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618819478

Over, M., Brischke, L.-A., and Leuser, L. (2020). «Das selbstverwaltete Wohnheim Collegium Academicum in Heidelberg: Suffizienz lernen, leben und verbreiten». In: Brokow-Loga A. and Eckardt, F., Eds., Postwachstumsstadt. Konturen einer solidarischen Stadtpolitik. Munchen: oekom verlag, 306-319.

Parrique, T., Barth, J., Briens, F., and Spangenberg, J. H. (2019). Decoupling Debunked. Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.

Pizzo, B. (2021). «Quale pianificazione fuori dal paradigma della crescita?». In: Giaimo C., Tosi M.C., and Voghera A., Eds., Tecniche urbanistiche per una fase di decrescita - Atti XXIII Conferenza Nazionale SIU VOLUME 01. Roma: Planum Publischer and Società italiana degli Urbanisti, 126-130.

Ruiz-Alejos, C., and Prats, V. (2022). «In quest of implementing degrowth in local urban planning policies». Local Environment, 27(4): 423-439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1983789

Savini, F. (2019). «Responsibility, polity, value: The (un)changing norms of planning practices». Planning Theory, 18(1): 58-81.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218770474

Savini, F. (2021). «Towards an urban degrowth: Habitability, finity and polycentric autonomism». Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(5): 1076-1095.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20981391

Schneider, F., Martinez-Alier, J., Asara, V., Schaefer, B., and Sekulova, F. (2013). «Sustainable housing in a post-growth Europe». Background paper Exploring policy options and open research questions, 2nd Multinational knowledge brokerage event on Sustainable Housing, Barcelona, 6-7 June.

Spanier, J., and Feola, G. (2022). «Nurturing the Post-Growth City. Bringing the rural back in». In: Savini,F., Ferreira, A., and von Schönfeld, K. C., Eds., Post-Growth Planning. Cities beyond the Market Economy. London: Routledge, 159-172.

Varvarousis, A. (2019). «Crisis, liminality and the decolonization of the social imaginary». Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 2(3): 493-512.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619841809

Wanner, T. (2015). «The new ‘passive revolution’of the green economy and growth discourse: Maintaining the ‘sustainable development’of neoliberal capitalism». New Political Economy, 20(1): 21-41.

Widmer, H., and Schneider, F. (2018). «Neighbourhoods as the basic module of the global commons». In: Nelson, A., and Schneider, F., Eds., Housing for Degrowth. London: Routledge, 156-170.

Wright, E. O. (2013). «Transforming Capitalism through Real Utopias». Irish Journal of Sociology, 21(2): 6-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7227/IJS.21.2.2

Xue, J. (2014). «Is eco-village/urban village the future of a degrowth society? An urban planner’s perspective». Ecological economics, 105: 130-138.

Xue, J. (2015). «Sustainable housing development: Decoupling or degrowth? A comparative study of Copenhagen and Hangzhou». Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(3): 620-639.

Xue, J., and Kębłowski, W. (2022). «Spatialising degrowth, degrowing urban planning». Local Environment, 27(4): 397-403.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2066642

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2023-12-31

Come citare

Krähmer, K. (2023). How to research something that doesn’t exist? : Reflections on the methodologies adopted in the literature on the spatialities of degrowth. Tracce Urbane. Rivista Italiana Transdisciplinare Di Studi Urbani, 10(14), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18632