Cultural practices for territorial cohesion

Authors

  • Inabita Laboratorio Territoriale
  • Matteo Giacomelli Inabita Laboratorio Territoriale, Ripe San Ginesio (MC)
  • Fulvia Calcagni Inabita Laboratorio Territoriale, Ripe San Ginesio (MC)
  • David Giacomelli Inabita Laboratorio Territoriale, Ripe San Ginesio (MC)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18662

Keywords:

Territorial cohesion, Cultural regeneration, Situated practices

Abstract

In the context of an overall trend of global unification, we are witnessing an increase in territorial inequalities that see cities grow and flourish at the expense of territories increasingly seen as marginal, fragile, and often the object of extraction of human and material resources. Within this picture, various attempts, political, academic or applied, move in the direction of overcoming the urban-rural binomial and attempt to give a new centrality to marginal territories based on the local cultural (festivals, residential artistic productions or regenerated spaces) or ecosystemic (biophysical, aesthetic, educational or recreational) assets that characterise them. Through the examination of Borgofuturo, an experience of cultural regeneration in the inland Le Marche region, we analyse how giving support to situated cultural practices can create fruitful relations and long-lasting processes which enable these territories to overturn dominant narratives of territorial polarisation and of value extraction, giving cultural actors a new leading role in discourses and policies of society-territory co-evolution.

References

Barbera F., De Rossi A. (2021). Metromontagna. Un progetto per riabitare l’Italia. Donzelli Editore.

Barca F. (2009). «An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations» (Barca Report). Bruxelles: European Parlament.

Barca F. (2018). Politica di coesione: tre mosse. IAI Documents, Bruxelles: European Parlament.

Barca F., Casavola P., Lucatelli S. (2014). Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne. Definizione, Obiettivi, Strumenti e Governance. Materiali Uval – Dipartimento per lo Sviluppo e la Coesione economica, 31.

Barca F., McCann P., Rodríguez-Pose A. (2012). «The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches*». Journal of Regional Science 52: 134-152.

Calafati A. (2015). Città tra sviluppo e declino, Saggi. Natura e artefatto. Roma: Donzelli Editore.

Escobar A. (1995). Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

European Union (2007). «Treaty of Lisbon Amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty Establishing the European Community». Official Journal of the European Union. Disponibile su: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/5/the-treaty-of-lisbon

Faludi A. (2007). Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society. Illustrated edition. Cambridge, Mass: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

Giacomelli M., Calcagni F. (2022). Borgofuturo+ Un progetto locale per le aree interne. Macerata: Quodlibet.

Lucatelli S., Luisi D., Tantillo F. (2022). L’Italia lontana. Una politica per le aree interne. Roma: Donzelli Editore.

Medeiros E. (2016). «Territorial Cohesion: An EU concept». European Journal of Spatial Development, 14: 30-30.

Pittau M.G., Zelli R., Gelman A. (2010). «Economic Disparities and Life Satisfaction in European Regions». Social Indicators Research, 96(2): 339-36.

Sen A. (1999). Commodities and Capabilities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Società dei Territorialisti/e. (2021). «Manifesto di Camaldoli per una nuova centralità della montagna». Scienze Del Territorio, 9.

Sørensen J.F.L. (2014). «Rural-Urban Differences in Life Satisfaction: Evidence from the European Union». Regional Studies 48: 1451-1466.

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Laboratorio Territoriale, I., Giacomelli, M., Calcagni, F., & Giacomelli, D. (2024). Cultural practices for territorial cohesion. Tracce Urbane. Rivista Italiana Transdisciplinare Di Studi Urbani, 11(15). https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/18662