Science and the Narration of Science: The Shadow Line Between Explanation and Manipulation


  • Andrea Pensotti University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Italy



The current use of science as an argument for political purposes reveals an old bias: the idea that science is about truth and therefore is potentially authoritarian. In reality, science is about doubt. The public management of the COVID pandemic should make
us reflect about several aspects of our society.


Abbas A H 2020, “Politicizing the pandemic: A schemata analysis of COVID-19 news in two selected newspapers”, International Journal for the Semiotic of Law, July 3 [ahead of print]. Available from:

Bruce Goldstein E 2010, Encyclopedia of Perception, New

York: SAGE Publications.

Cinelli M et al.2020, “The COVID-19 social media infodemic”, Scientific Reports, vol. 10, article no. 16598. Available from:

“Coronavirus, Zingaretti aperitivo pubblico a Milano: “Niente panico, isolare i focolai. Il governissimo? Non c’è la crisi” 2020 (27 February), Repubblica[online]

“Coronavirus, Galli: “Fatti pochi tamponi, il numero dei contagiati è più alto di quello ufficiale” 2020 (13 March), Repubblica[online]


Dahlstrom M 2014, “Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences”, PNAS, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 13614-13620.

D’Aria I 2020 (12 February), “Coronavirus, in Italia fa più

danni l’influenza. Ma il timore del virus ci rende più

attenti”, Repubblica[online]


piu_le_regole_di_igiene-248416492/) .

Gardner et al. 2018, “Effect of low-fat vs low-carbohydrate diet on 12-month weight loss in overweight adults and the association with genotype pattern or insulin secretion: The DIETFITS randomized clinical trial”, JAMA, vol. 319, no. 7, pp. 667–679.DOI:10.1001/jama.2018.0245

Ioannidis J P A 2021, “Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 inferred from seroprevalence data”, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, no. 99, pp. 19-33F. Available from:


Jones M D & Anderson Crow D 2017, “How can we use the ‘science of stories’ to produce persuasive scientific stories?”, Palgrave Communications, vol. 3, article no. 53. Available from:

Kuhn T 1957, The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mallapaty S 2020, “How deadly is the coronavirus? Scientists are close to an answer”, Nature, vol. 582, pp. 467-468. DOI:

Mitra et al.2020, “Potential years of life lost due to COVID-19 in the United States, Italy, and Germany: An old formula with newer ideas”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 17, no. 12, p. 4392. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17124392.

Schwab K 2020, COVID-19: The Great Reset, Cologny/

Geneva: Forum Publishing.

Tebano E 2020 (2 May), “Coronavirus, come si calcola l’indice di contagio R0 da cui dipenderà quando

potremo tornare a uscire”, Corriere della Sera




Verstuyf J et al.2012, “Motivational dynamics of eating regulation: a self-determination theory perspective”, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 9, article no. 21. Available from:




How to Cite

Pensotti, A. (2021). Science and the Narration of Science: The Shadow Line Between Explanation and Manipulation. Organisms. Journal of Biological Sciences, 4(2), 133–136.



Special Section