Nel tempo incerto della riparazione. Approcci collaborativi per una pianificazione decoloniale
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562/19219Parole chiave:
approcci collaborativi, pianificazione, comunità aborigeneAbstract
Decolonizzare la pianificazione attraverso l’uso di linguaggi filmici e pratiche collaborative. Questa la cornice entro cui è stato realizzato il progetto di ricerca-azione condotto insieme alla Ts’il Kaz Koh First Nation e alla Cheslatta Carrier Nation nella British Columbia. Attraverso una pratica etnografica immersiva, la co-produzione di un documentario e l’organizzazione di dialogue circles, il progetto ha attivato processi di riconoscimento, memoria e trasformazione collettiva, affrontando conflitti e ferite storiche ancora aperte. Il racconto dell’intero processo di ricerca contribuisce a riflettere criticamente sul ruolo della pianificazione come pratica trasformativa, capace di rigenerare legami sociali e futuri condivisi.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Attili G. (2007). «Digital Ethnographies in the Planning Field». Planning Theory and Practice, 8(1): 90-98. DOI: 10.1080/14649350712331393349.
Attili G., Sandercock L. (2007). Where strangers become neighbours: the story of the Collingwood Neighbourhood House and the integration of immigrants in Vancouver. Montreal: National Film Board of Canada (documentary).
Bourdieu P. (1990). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bush R. A., Folger J. P. (2004). Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Chilisa B. (2012). Indigenous Research Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Christian D. (2017). Gathering knowledge: Indigenous methodologies of land/place-based visual storytelling/filmmaking and visual sovereignty. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
Churchman C.W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems. New York: Basic Books.
Decandia L. (2000). Dell’identità. Saggio sui luoghi: per una critica della razionalità urbanistica. Catanzaro: Rubettino.
Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Eckstein B., Throgmorton J., a cura di, (2003). Story and Sustainability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Escobar A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Flyvbjerg B. (1996). «The Dark Side of Planning: Rationality and Realrationalität». In: Mandelbaum S., Mazza L., Burchell R., a cura di., Explorations in Planning Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research Press: pp. 383-394.
Flyvbjerg B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Flyvbjerg B. (2011). «Why Mass Media Matter, and How to Work With Them: The Case of Phronesis, Ethics, and Megaprojects». In: Flyvberg B., Landman T., Schram S., a cura di, Real Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forester J. (1999). The Deliberative Practitioner. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Friedmann J (1973). Retracking America: A Theory of Transactive Planning. New York: Anchor Press.
Geertz C (1988) Works and Lives: the Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Harris C. (1997). The Resettlement of British Columbia. Essays on Colonialism and Geographical Change. Vancouver: University of BC Press.
Harris, C. (2002). Making Native Space. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Hatch H (2021). Wochiigii lo: End of the Peace. National Film Board of Canada (film).
Hibbard M., Lane M., Rasmussen K. (2008). «The Split Personality of Planning: Indigenous Peoples and Planning for Land and Resource Management». Journal of Planning Literature, 23(1): 136–51. DOI: 10.1177/0885412208322922.
Holmes D. R., Marcus G. E. (2008). «Collaboration Today and the Re imagination of the Classic Scene of Fieldwork Encounter». Collaborative Anthropologies, 1(1), 81–101. DOI: 10.1353/cla.0.0003.
hooks b. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. Boston: South End Press.
Husserl E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Jackson S. (1998). Geographies of Co-existence: Native Title, Cultural Difference and the Decolonization of Planning in North Australia. Unpublished PhD dissertation, School of Earth Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney.
Jacobs, J.M. (1996). Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City. London: Routledge.
Jojola T. (1998). «Indigenous Planning: Clans, Intertribal Confederations and the History of the All-Indian Pueblo Council». In: Sandercock L., a cura di, Making the Invisible Visible: A Multicultural History of Planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jojola T. (2008). «Indigenous Planning: An Emerging Context». Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 17(1): 37-47, http://www.jstor.org/stable/26193203.
Kindon S., Pain R., Kesby M., a cura di, (2007). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
Kovach M. (2009). Indigenous Methodologies: Characteristics, Conversations, and Contexts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Landry C. (2000). The Creative City. London: Earthscan.
Landry C. (2006). The Art of City Making. London: Earthscan.
LeBaron M. (2002). Bridging Troubled Waters: Conflict Resolution from the Heart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lederach J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Legacy of Hope Foundation (2004–2008). Residential School Survivor Stories. In Our Stories… Our Strength. https://legacyofhope.ca/wherearethechildren/stories/ (video testimonies).
Lerner G. (1997). Why History Matters. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Levy P. (1997). L’intelligenza collettiva. Milano: Feltrinelli.
Mandelbaum, S. (1991). «Telling Stories». Journal of Planning Education and Research, 10(1): 209-214. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X9101000308.
Merleau Ponty M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.
Mignolo W. D. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
National Film Board of Canada (2017). Urban.Indigenous.Proud. NFB/Studio One (film).
NCRA/ANREC (2012–2015). Resonating Reconciliation. National Campus and Community Radio Association (film).
Ortiz C., Cordoba O. G. (2023). «Territorial Healing». Planning Theory & Practice, 24(2): 180–198. DOI: 10.1177/14730952231181129.
Porter L. (2010). Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
Quijano A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South
Rabinow P., Sullivan W. M., a cura di, (1987). Interpretive Social Science: a Second Look. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Reason P., Bradbury H., a cura di, (2008). The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: SAGE Publications.
Roy A. (2016). «Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1): 200-209. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12274.
RCAP (1996). Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples, 5 vols. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
Said E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vantage Books.
Sandercock L. (1998). Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities. Chichester: Wiley.
Sandercock L. (2003). Cosmopolis 2: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century. London: Continuum.
Sandercock L. (2005a). «A Planning Imagination for the 21st Century». Journal of the American Planning Association. 70(2), 133-141. DOI:10.1080/01944360408976368.
Sandercock L. (2005b). «A New Spin on the Creative City: Artist/Planner Collaborations». Planning Theory & Practice. 6, 1: 101-103. DOI:10.1080/1464935042000334985.
Sandercock L., Attili G. (2012). «Unsettling a Settler Society: film, phronesis and collaborative planning in small-town Canada». In: Flyvbjerg B., Landman T. e Schram S., a cura di, Real Social Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sandercock L., Attili G. (2014). «Changing the Lens: Film as Action Research and Therapeutic Planning Practice». Journal of Planning Education and Research, 34(1): 19-29. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X1351649.
Sarkissian W., Hurford D., Wenman C. (2010). Creative Community Planning: Transformative engagement methods for working at the edge. London: Earthscan.
Smith L. T. (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London & New York: Zed Books.
Stanger-Ross J. (2008). «Municipal Colonialism in Vancouver: City Planning and the Conflict over Indian reserves, 1928-1950s». Canadian Historical Review, 89(4): 541–80. DOI:10.1353/CAN.0.0113.
Stretton H. (1969). The Political Sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Trinh T. M. (1989). Woman Native Other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Tuck E., Yang K. W. (2014). «R words: Refusing Research». In: Paris D., Winn M. T., a cura di, Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Turner V. (1993). Antropologia della performance. Bologna: Il Mulino
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Giovanni Attili
TQuesto lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
NOTA DI COPYRIGHT
Proposta di licenza Creative Commons
1. Proposta per riviste Open Access
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano le seguenti condizioni:
Gli autori mantengono i diritti sulla loro opera e cedono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione dell'opera, contemporaneamente licenziata sotto una Licenza Creative Commons - Attribuzione che permette ad altri di condividere l'opera indicando la paternità intellettuale e la prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
Gli autori possono aderire ad altri accordi di licenza non esclusiva per la distribuzione della versione dell'opera pubblicata (es. depositarla in un archivio istituzionale o pubblicarla in una monografia), a patto di indicare che la prima pubblicazione è avvenuta su questa rivista.
Gli autori possono diffondere la loro opera online (es. in repository istituzionali o nel loro sito web) prima e durante il processo di submission, poiché può portare a scambi produttivi e aumentare le citazioni dell'opera pubblicata (Vedi The Effect of Open Access).
