"Enabling" Space. Dialogues and bridges between institutions and self-organized practices for a collaborative territorial planning.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562_2.3.14304

Keywords:

Periferie, Spazi Pubblici, riqualificazione, progettazione, studi urbani,

Abstract

-

Author Biographies

Stefania Ragozino, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

Istituto di Ricerca suInnovazione e Servizi per lo Sviluppo

Gabriella Esposito De Vita, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche

Istituto di Ricerca suInnovazione e Servizi per lo Sviluppo

References

Albrechts, L. (2003). Planning and power: towards an emancipatory planning approach. Environment and Planning C, 21(6), 905–924.

Bridge, G., & Watson, S. (2003). A companion to the city. Hoboken: Blackwell.

Bridge, G., & Watson, S. (2010). Retext(ur)ing the City. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 5(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810152706060

Brown, A., & Kristiansen, A. (2009). Urban Policies and the Right to the City: Rights, responsibilities and citizenship. UNESCO.

Esposito De Vita, G. (2018). How to Reclaim Mafia-Controlled Territory? An Emancipatory Experience in Southern Italy. In S. Knierbein & T. Viderman (Eds.), Public Space Unbound. Urban Emancipation and the Post-Political Condition (pp. 54–68). London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315449203-4

Hillier, J. (2002). Direct Action and Agonism in Democratic Planning Practice. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning Futures. New Directions for Planning Theory (Vol. 1). London, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Knierbein, S., & Viderman, T. (2018). Public space unbound: urban emancipation and the post-political condition. London & New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=YGRRDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT17&dq=Public+Space+Unbound,+knierbein&ots=lg-sQ-BLMu&sig=g_smr7BbgLUunjXhIY9Ad-g4Dms#v=onepage&q=Public Space Unbound%2C knierbein&f=false

Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London, New York: Verso Books.

Novy, J., & Colomb, C. (2013). Struggling for the right to the (creative) city in Berlin and Hamburg: new urban social movements, new ‘spaces of hope’? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1816–1838.

Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.

Ragozino, S., & Varriale, A. (2018). ‘The City Decides!’ Political Standstill and Social Movements in Post-Industrial Naples. In Public Space Unbound. Urban Emancipation and the Post-Political Condition (pp. 209–224). London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315449203-14

Simmel, G. (1908). The stranger. Social Theory: The Multicultural and Classic Readings, 4.

Tayebi, A. (2013). Planning activism: using social media to claim marginalized citizens’ right to the city. Cities, 32, 88–93.

Watson, S. (2013). City Publics. The (dis)enchantments of urban encounters. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962954

Downloads

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Ragozino, S., & Esposito De Vita, G. (2018). "Enabling" Space. Dialogues and bridges between institutions and self-organized practices for a collaborative territorial planning. Tracce Urbane. Rivista Italiana Transdisciplinare Di Studi Urbani, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.13133/2532-6562_2.3.14304